Emp bomber is OP

And about mobile aa how much m cost for mobile just to kill that plane would be needed? It is absolutely op and whole mobile AA thing just dont make sense. It cost 600m one spider 400m(it is antiair so it should be cheaper than actual bomber cost) could kill it before whole units would be emped? NO! 2 spiders? NO! about those crappy light bot factory bots there is no even talk they would simply die. Lighy bot aa is good ONLY against blastwings nothing more. In my logic if u spend same or less m on mobile aa it should completely protect against flying things. If u build static aa it should be MUCH cheaper than actual bombers whaetever flying cost.

Now u need two hacksaws (to have no damage) which costs 600m=NO SENSE and can be easily fooled by flying insects or one long range aa which costs 800m. And not clear how much M spent on mobile aa.

Spy dont emp lvl4 com( u need tow spy's) and i dont think dante either.
Lets simple count 600m vs 300m STATIC AA + 2x~100(light veh) + ~500 flaker whole + ~70m light AA thats ~1000 m in AA and in fact if that flaker would be near hacksaw that emp bomber wouldnt even be killed and that was way more aa in early game that is called "normal". So say whatever you want it is OP specially if u rush it in small map games, then whole bases are emped and are free to ride which very often happens on darkside remake.

Spy is whole diferent thing it is tactical u can prevent being emped with or just being surrounded by units it works against units which are alone. Emp bombers just emp. No any micro needed.

Unable to watch replay right now so ill just ask: were you using radsr so the aa knew te bomber was coming?

Emp bomber does seem a little op to me though but i havent used it extensively yet. The thing that stuck out to me is that it has a huge area of effect, so maybe that radius could be reduced somewhat.