Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Forum index  > General discussion   >

Statistics from Dr.Freund

11 posts, 597 views
Post comment
Filter:    Player:  
sort
SErankZnack
4 years ago
CHrankAdminDeinFreund

Could you make something similar too this but abit more up to date.

https://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/22919?postID=163546#163546
+3 / -0

NOrankAdminKingstad
4 years ago
I'd like an update on this: https://zero-k.info/Forum/Post/163323#163323
+3 / -0

CHrankAdminDeinFreund
4 years ago
(edited 4 years ago)

FFA Ladders


1. NOrankAdminKingstad : 2326.1
2. SErankGodde : 2305.6
3. CHrankAdminDeinFreund : 2299.0
4. RUrankizirayd : 2287.0
5. DErankManu12 : 2196.6
6. SErank[Er0]Godde : 2190.3
7. SKrankSvatopluk : 2178.7
8. CArankyurit1337 : 2175.1
9. CArankPetTurtle : 2155.6
10. GBrankSab : 2139.5
11. CZrankpsaniac : 2134.8
12. CArankbanman : 2125.2
13. USrank[I]burp : 2125.1
14. AUrankAdminGoogleFrog : 2124.0
15. DErankKlon : 2095.2
16. GBrankdyth68 : 2091.5
17. ROrankForever : 2074.7
18. USrankAdminJasper : 2072.3
19. NZrankhungdonkey : 2069.1
20. RUrankindaled : 2051.5
[Spoiler]

The ratings are taken from the last FFA game that person played. If you took the maximum rating it would be a bit better for some people, including myself. As always changing the WHR configuration also changes the ladders, I tried to configure it for maximum accuracy in FFA matches. But then I saw that I was #1 which would look like I'm tweaking it for my own good, so I added a bit more weight to recent matches Don't take the numbers too seriously. Either way, the top three were always the same in different permutations.

Big Teams Ladders


5v5+, balanced team matches only.

1. SErank[Er0]Godde : 2769.8
2. SErankGodde : 2651.7
3. ROrankForgotten : 2292.7
4. ROrankForever : 2287.5
5. ROrankSigero : 2285.3
6. USrankFireplace : 2274.3
7. @zenfur : 2239.0
8. JPrankSoftwareBug : 2191.6
9. DErankMoffmaster : 2167.8
10. GBrankSab : 2152.5
11. GBrank[Fx]Drone : 2147.3
12. USrankluckywaldo7 : 2145.6
13. DErankManu12 : 2138.9
14. DErankLimb : 2121.3
15. NLrankBlackdutchie : 2117.3
16. MYrankAdminHistidine : 2095.8
17. LUrankAdminAnir : 2085.1
18. RUrankYurGa : 2079.4
19. RUrankindaled : 2066.5
20. IErankDetonation : 2066.3
[Spoiler]

I didn't even bother tuning the values here, because trying to rate one player based on the result of a team with many more players is nearly impossible.
+9 / -0

NOrankAdminKingstad
4 years ago
Thank you Dr. Sigmund Freund!
+2 / -0


GBrankdyth68
4 years ago
How hard is this to run automatically?
+0 / -0
USrankAdminJasper
4 years ago
(edited 4 years ago)
Some of those people in the FFA ladder have not logged in 6 years and two Goddes.
+0 / -0

LVrankSenaven
4 years ago
If i loose game FFA it takes my casual (custom) WHR or FFA have separate invisible ladder?
+0 / -0

CHrankAdminDeinFreund
4 years ago
(edited 4 years ago)
On the ZK server there is only the casual and the competitive ladder. FFA and all other games played on public hosts count for the casual rating.

GBrankdyth68
Not very hard, but it doesn't seem like a good addition. Usually games have one competitive ladder and one rating per player. Right now not even one rating is properly communicated to the player in the shape of post-game debriefings or otherwise. The last thing I want is to add more ratings to make the already confusing system worse.
+2 / -0
AUrankTankium
4 years ago
Y are there grey colour ranks on the leaderboard
+0 / -0

CHrankAdminDeinFreund
4 years ago
Because ranks are a very recent addition in comparison to ZK's age. Ranks are also meant more as a reward system, than a perfect rating system. These ladders don't discriminate for activity.
+0 / -0

LVrankSenaven
4 years ago
I want my yellow rank. I don't understand how did i get this blue one in lobster pots.
+0 / -0