Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

default game size 12 instead of 10

6 posts, 812 views
Post comment
Filter:    Player:  
sort
13 years ago
You asked us:
"We are considering setting default game size to 10 players. We hope this will mean more games and less idle time and less lags ingame. What do you think?"

I voted for 10 (5v5) or less, because i think its better (due to lagg and idle time, as you told) than much more players, but my suggestion you can see following:

Why 10 Players and not 12? If you got 10 Players you can only make 2 or 5 even teams. If you set the default game size to 12 you could make 2, 3 and 4 teams.

What do you think about that suggestion?

PS.: Im sorry if i made some grammar mistakes, hopefully you understand my post regardless.
+0 / -0


13 years ago
Yeah true, 12 is divisible by more numbers.
+0 / -0


13 years ago
I was under the impression that it would be a teamgame autohost. There could be a FFA autohost with a far larger limit.

Although what is to stop teamgames in the FFA autohost? If it was enforced you might lose players in a transition if many decide they want to switch between FFA or teamgame. Without the players to keep both types of autohost active I don't think we can enforce so 12 makes sense if the autohost is for many game types.
+0 / -0

13 years ago
Ok, default 10, I will set to 16 once I join though
+0 / -0
13 years ago
From [1uP]archl:
"Ok, default 10, I will set to 16 once I join though"

What is the command to change the default?
+0 / -0


13 years ago
Well it cannot be changed normally ... !setmaxplayers and !rehost

but you can use !manage to effectively limit counts
+0 / -0