Alright, I admit that I was mistaken and east did launch coordinated attacks. Yes, you are right.

I think this is a case of overestimating your enemies though. Yes, west had the strength to win before we did. But facing two dantes, a cloud of vamps and what looks like shielded porc in the radar, I was afraid to commit to an attack that might fail and reverse the advantage.

Especially when I could not count on my allies to back up any push from me.

So I sat on the supermexes and wreckage field until my ally forced my hand and revealed the enemy's weakness.
I knew we would win if we could hold center; and if I judged attacking to be risky, I maintain that not attacking was the right decision.

Perhaps I could have scouted. Perhaps I delayed attacking too long. Maybe I should have built a warlord. Yes, those were options that I could have taken and did not. Suffice it to say that I am not a perfect player and I often forget options available to me.


BladeArtist:
To you, it looked like we were prolonging the game. For that I'm sorry and I apologize. Please understand that, to me, when I was on the spot, it did not seem that way.

I'm not sorry enough to be reckless though. =)