Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Back to List

DWDeadDesert Supported

By smoke_th
Rating:

Dire World Dead Desert
Size: 16 x 16

PLAY ON THIS MAP


Downloads: 432
Manual downloads:
http://api.springfiles.com/files/maps/dwdeaddesert.sd7
http://spring1.admin-box.com/maps/dwdeaddesert.sd7
https://zero-k.info/content/maps/dwdeaddesert.sd7
http://zero-k.info/content/maps/dwdeaddesert.sd7

Last battles

Bots B888213 2 on DWDeadDesert
Bots B888192 2 on DWDeadDesert
Bots B848007 3 on DWDeadDesert
Bots B847983 3 on DWDeadDesert
Bots B758358 1 on DWDeadDesert
Bots B756801 3 on DWDeadDesert
Bots B734519 3 on DWDeadDesert
Bots B731065 3 on DWDeadDesert
Bots B720787 3 on DWDeadDesert
Bots B716334 2 on DWDeadDesert


Preview
Filter:    Player:  
Page of 2 (22 records)
sort
USrankAdminJasper
9 years ago
Featured
+0 / -0
Skasi
9 years ago
Ooo, looks interesting.
+0 / -0
PLrankOrfelius
9 years ago
Ugh it was made by smoke_the_fumus ak "FUCK FUCK YOU IDIOT" guy the famous creator of such map marvels as techno lands or greenfields.

To my surprise this actually does look... pretty decent. I am pleasantly surprised.
+0 / -0
USrankFealthas
9 years ago
This map is a little large and metal heavy for 1v1. It looks great for 2v2 and 3v3 formats though.

Suggestion to remove it from 1v1 pool.
+2 / -0

AUrankAdminAquanim
9 years ago
wait this got featured 1v1? lmao
+1 / -0
USrankdorsh
9 years ago
(edited 9 years ago)
fealthas and i played a 1v1 on this and it was enormous, it feels like a 3v3 at minimum. very cool looking with the super steep sides to the canyon. way too big for 1v1
+0 / -0
Skasi
9 years ago
Texture map is misleading, heightmap is super extreme. ~800 height difference. Would be cool if there were a version with the height cut down to a third or so.
+3 / -0

PLrankAdminSprung
9 years ago
Porcfest. Wind is 2.3 in start area and the canyon is super hard to assault upwards.
+0 / -0


AUrankAdminGoogleFrog
9 years ago
Yes, probably shouldn't be featured.
+0 / -0


PLrankRafalpluk
9 years ago
(edited 9 years ago)
It is also too spider heavy and gunship heavy, because large amount of mexes are in corners where other units cant reach.
+0 / -0


AUrankAdminGoogleFrog
9 years ago
Unfeatured.
+0 / -0

CHrankAdminDeinFreund
9 years ago
(edited 9 years ago)
quote:

AUrankAdminGoogleFrog
Unfeatured.


Can we get a poll?

Might be a nice feature to have a poll for each map. Or some kind of rating that works, unlike the existing rating.
+0 / -0

PLrankAdminSprung
9 years ago
People are too complacent. Polls mean stagnation.
+0 / -0

CHrankAdminDeinFreund
9 years ago
Only feature 50 highest rated maups.4
+0 / -0
PLrankOrfelius
9 years ago
quote:
Can we get a poll?

USrankAdminJasper doesn't needs polls to mingle with map pool why should AUrankAdminGoogleFrog?

quote:
Might be a nice feature to have a poll for each map. Or some kind of rating that works, unlike the existing rating.

In this case all trololo maps would be featured.
+0 / -0
USrankFealthas
9 years ago
CHrankAdminDeinFreund do you remember when porn star and that map that was just a picture of a swastika were the #1 and #2 maps? Im not sure top 50 is a good idea.
+0 / -0

CHrankAdminDeinFreund
9 years ago
(edited 9 years ago)
When you're forced to play a crappy map in automated matchmaking you'll pretty quickly downvote it. A minimum rating count should prevent trolls.

Ofc there would have to be different categories so you can vote duck to best ffa map, duke nukem to best 1v1 map, ninja k2 to best teams map and titan duel to best fun map. I trust in the majority of the zk community to make senseful votes.

Admins would be able to temporarily feature a new map so it gets some ratings.

Just a suggestion, I don't think that the current map pool is bad, but neither do I think that the current solution scales well.

(Also none of my comments is related to thus particular map, #zkforum)
+0 / -0


PLrankRafalpluk
9 years ago
(edited 9 years ago)
quote:
A minimum rating count should prevent trolls.


I don't think it would be that easy. We are talking about trolls who made 20000 accounts in a timeframe of minutes using an automated script.
+0 / -0

CHrankAdminDeinFreund
9 years ago
(edited 9 years ago)
Aren't polls already lvl 20+? If not maek them at least 5+

If it's possible to spam x thousand accs from the same ip we have a more serious issue than skewed polls.
+0 / -0
DErank[2up]knorke
9 years ago
(edited 9 years ago)
quote:
If it's possible to spam x thousand accs from the same ip we have a more serious issue than skewed polls.

http://zero-k.info/Users?Name=chesti&IsAdmin=false&RegisteredFrom=&RegisteredTo=&LastLoginFrom=&LastLoginTo=&grorder=&grdesc=False&grpage=1
24300+ accounts, one per seconde (and that seconde delay is maybe not even nessecary)
/edit: actually several per seconde. well you get the idea..
+0 / -0
Page of 2 (22 records)
Back to List