Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Back to List

Twin Lakes Park 1 Featured

By TheMooseIsLoose
Rating:

Tall mountains and many passes. Large teams.
Size: 24 x 20

PLAY ON THIS MAP


Downloads: 2687
Manual downloads:
http://zero-k.info/content/games/twin_lakes_park_1.sd7

Last battles

Multiplayer B952690 4 on Twin Lakes Park 1
Bots B952659 4 on Twin Lakes Park 1
Bots B952600 4 on Twin Lakes Park 1
Multiplayer B951964 8 on Twin Lakes Park 1
Multiplayer B951956 8 on Twin Lakes Park 1
Bots B951814 2 on Twin Lakes Park 1
Bots B950795 4 on Twin Lakes Park 1
Bots B950444 2 on Twin Lakes Park 1
Bots B950288 4 on Twin Lakes Park 1
Bots B950258 2 on Twin Lakes Park 1


Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort


CArankTheMooseIsLoose
6 years ago


+6 / -0

PLrankAdminSprung
6 years ago
Supported. Produce some replays to get featured.
+1 / -0
NLrankWesley
6 years ago
looks really cool, maybe a smaller version for 1v1?

+2 / -0

CHrankAdminDeinFreund
6 years ago
Can maps get featured now? I thought that was unfeatured since steaming.
+2 / -0

PLrankAdminSprung
6 years ago
The problems with touching feature status at release were:
  • Steam package would not contain campaign maps if they were not also featured. This prevented unfeaturing maps that were used in the campaign (which then prevented featuring a newer version due to the no-duplicates policy). This has been fixed in that there's a .txt file with an exception list which contains all the maps.
  • people need to have all the MM maps downloaded to queue up for MM. This is still valid, but I believe MMing a map just before a Steam content update is fine.
  • people doing !map in a populated room could put some downloading strain on the server, we couldn't risk that on release but should be fine now.
+3 / -0


AUrankAdminGoogleFrog
5 years ago
Featured.
+0 / -0


CArankTheMooseIsLoose
4 years ago
(edited 4 years ago)
Map is now completely broken for some reason, game fails to start.

https://hastebin.com/qedijuloxe.md
+0 / -0

PLrankAdminSprung
4 years ago
(edited 4 years ago)
quote:

[f=-000001] Error: [LuaRules::RunCallInTraceback] error=4 (LUA_ERRMEM) callin=LoadCode trace=[Internal Lua error: Call failure] not enough memory
[f=-000001] [LuaMemPool::LogStats][handle=LuaRules (unsynced)] index=18446744073709551615 {numAllocs[*],allocSums[*]}={0,0} {int,ext,rec}Allocs={0,15069745,0} {chunk,block}Bytes={0,0}
[f=-000001] [LuaMemPool::LogStats][handle=LuaRules (synced)] index=18446744073709551615 {numAllocs[*],allocSums[*]}={0,0} {int,ext,rec}Allocs={0,15069745,0} {chunk,block}Bytes={0,0}
+0 / -0
unknownrankTinySpider
4 years ago
Wtf is wrong with the start "boxes"
+0 / -0


CArankTheMooseIsLoose
4 years ago
The start boxes attempt to constrain drop points to areas flat enough to build factories, unfortunately end result is just too small.
+0 / -0
Back to List