Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Japan v. USA giant mech battle

16 posts, 3500 views
Post comment
Filter:    Player:  
sort
9 years ago
http://arstechnica.com/the-multiverse/2015/07/american-and-japanese-mechs-set-to-duel-for-supremacy/
the future is truly here
+3 / -0

9 years ago
Completely pointless in real combat.
+0 / -0
This is such a facepalm for the US. We challenged them to a paintball match in what's basically a glorified tractor with some CO2 cannons. There's not even a fucking remote interface, keep that in mind for the next bit.

The Kuratas has fully articulable five-digit manipulators available, as well as "hand" operated weapons. The drive system has four independent wheels on articulated legs, and includes the ability to raise or lower the center of gravity for the robot as well. Japan, being a bunch certifiable badasses, not only said "yes", but asked to have a melee competition instead of a super lame paintball fight.

This is a genius move, because as mentioned above, the US robot sucks giant metallic nuts. Having zero ability to redistribute its weight, no manipulator attachments, using continuous track propulsion, the Mk II is unequivocally ill-suited for melee combat. It requires two humans to be in the cockpit to operate at the moment, so there's no way it could safely fight in its current state to begin with. I doubt they could even make the needed adapatations, let alone develop the new systems they'd need to get to where Kuratas is now, within 12 months.

I just hope these losers accept help from the thousands (millions?) of knowledgable, patriotic, US roboticists and mechanical engineers who actually know what the fuck they're doing so we don't get too badly embarrassed next summer.
+2 / -0
9 years ago
Looks fun.
I hope for some real fight, within limits as any sport but still each side trying to win, and not merely scripted entertainment.
So not like last year when a robot arm was supposed to play a ping-pong match vs some human champion. ( http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/6979 )
But then there was just videos with fancy camera angles and slow-motion. Nice to look at but I had expected a "man vs machine" match with score keeping.
+0 / -0

9 years ago
Yeah I saw all this, the Mk II is shitty but you have to admit it's a genius PR move by the people behind it, bet they get tons of donations from people thinking the same thing as you not wanting USA to totally embarrass itself :p

The hype is awesome but the reality will probably suck. If they actually work their ass off to make it not suck then it will definitely be the start of something great, maybe more companies/countries will join in and we'll have like an annual mech battle lol.
+3 / -0
All i know is i'm completely disinterested in racing, football, hockey, tennis -- but i'd watch giant melee robot competitions if they were more regular.
+5 / -0
9 years ago
quote:
All i know is i'm completely disinterested in racing, football, hockey, tennis -- but i'd watch giant melee robot competitions if they were more regular.


Robot fighting must be the next premiere sport then

+0 / -0
9 years ago
ok now I know where I want to work. Shall I send my curriculum to Kurata :D????
+0 / -0


9 years ago
USrankkaen: Your average backhoe loader isn't big on fully articulable manipulators, independent wheels, or moving its center of gravity either, but getting into a wrestling match with one still doesn't sound like a good idea.
+0 / -0

9 years ago
ITrankOldGhostStalker Oh I see, aligning with the Japanese already? Typical axis Italian scum.

What I don't get about this competition is that neither company wants to see their expensive robots get damaged and their robots require human pilot, how can they have melee combat or big guns etc if there is a human on board, I can only imagine it will be some kind of shitty paintball fight and the swords will be made of styrofoam or something lol
+1 / -0
Kuratas already has a "master/slave" remote interface. Mk II could be outfitted with one, assuming the propulsion isn't tethered to the physical controls in some ridiculous way. (Side note: the vast majority of modern robots have only remote interfaces, so MegaBots' failure to include one in the first pass is a smell that they are more gear heads than roboticists).

It sounds like Kuratas' creators (SHI) want real-deal melee combat, complete with probable damage to the robots. That's another layer of the genius: Kuratas was designed for production. They plan to sell these things to rich people (1.4 million USD), so this isn't the only giant fighting robot they planned to make. MegaBots, on the other hand, appears to have just this one, and is building them as a POC for their own grand scheme -- which has always been a large-scale robotic combat league. But they didn't really design this with mass production in mind, so their one robot is probably more dear to them than SHI's. I think MegaBots is likely to back out if SHI won't budge on the physical melee combat idea -- they can't really afford to lose the Mk II, and the paintball fight is their actual goal. They're trying to jump start their league with this stunt.
+0 / -0
Here's an illustration that shows how melee combat between the two would go. Notice how the Mk II is almost comically top-heavy and has no back-fall protection:



If robotic melee combat ever takes off, this will be one of the first issues we need to address. Even DARPA's robots have a hard time remaining standing
+2 / -0
For contrast: Here's Kuratas in its raised and lowered stances:




Good luck pushing that thing over. And, yes, Kuratas is fucking street legal.
+2 / -0

9 years ago
The MkII has tank treads, it shouldn't have any difficulty with staying upright but I don't get why the hell it has those legs? They serve absolutely no purpose other than to make it look more mech-like. That's the problem with these "mechs" it's like aesthetics takes priority over efficiency.

The Kurata thing makes a lot more sense though.
+2 / -0
The japanese things has 4 small wheels, how will it have enough power & traction to push anything?

quote:
I can only imagine it will be some kind of shitty paintball fight and the swords will be made of styrofoam or something lol
Both paintball and pillow fights can be fun!

But beside that:
Interessted in the competetion/sport part: There are not even rules yet.
Interessted in big machines: This is less fascinating than 'reality.'

In melee both these things would lose to a random construction machine. Those move faster, can go offroad, lift their own weight, self-right when fallen over, climb, robust enough to handle daily abuse, ...

I would rather buy something that can actually drive through walls instead of just looking cool?
Even outside motorsports, the machines in use every day are more awesome than those "futuristic mechs."
Stupid billionairs always buying crap.

Bit related, "Battle Bots" from 2000 is currently getting reboot. Smaller scale but funny.
+2 / -0
DErank[2up]knorke, both of these rigs are using gasoline engines (Kuratas is diesel, Mk II is actually a Honda) to power hydraulic pumps, and also have on-board CO2 for powering the paintball/airsoft guns. It's easy to imagine Kuratas applying full brakes, digging in, and extending a pole/lance/strut/fist-like module to deliver a good shot. You're right that both would lose to really any piece of construction machinery, though.

GBrank[Fx]Drone, look at the short length of the tracks compared to the height of the cockpit. You have a mechanical advantage if you push at the top. Aiming towards the top will give you good leverage, and if the Mk II has forward momentum in its treads, it will actually be easier to tip over backwards (bottom goes forward, but top is constrained by the "fist", causing an incline), and feasibly propel itself into that state.


Speaking of battle bots, a retro flipper module would make an easy old-school win for the Kuratas :)
+0 / -0