| 3 |
Okay, again, I agree (naturally) on the tone aspect...and I guess I'll keep it in mind, as well as point it out (along with the offending terms, if any) to any people (unknowingly) violating the CoC.
|
3 |
Okay, again, I agree (naturally) on the tone aspect...and I guess I'll keep it in mind, as well as point it out (along with the offending terms, if any) to any people (unknowingly) violating the CoC.
|
| 5 |
@Sprung
-
Haha,
I
was
there
when
that
was
said.
.
.
and
true.
Perhaps
this
ought
to
be
pointed
out
in
the
CoC
as
well?
o.
O
|
5 |
@Sprung
-
Haha,
I
was
there
when
that
was
said.
.
.
and
true.
Perhaps
this
ought
to
be
pointed
out
in
the
CoC
as
well?
It
sort
of
contradicts
the
tone/context
argument,
though
-
the
latter
says
it
is
possible
to
use
potentially-contextually
abusive
words
in
a
non-abusive
manner
(
including,
and
particularly,
with
your
friends)
,
but
the
'you
are
in
a
public
place
and
may
set
a
wrong
precedent'
aspect
says
no
one
else
knows
it
was
an
inside
thing
with
your
friends.
.
.
if
that
makes
any
sense
:s
|
Clarification of the Code of Conduct