Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Air fac is no fun anymore :(

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
4/16/2014 4:03:43 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
4/16/2014 4:03:16 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
4/16/2014 3:57:57 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote] Are you seriously proposing allowing AA to shoot ground? Eg. screamer. I don't understand that seems absurd.[/quote] 1 [quote] Are you seriously proposing allowing AA to shoot ground? Eg. screamer. I don't understand that seems absurd.[/quote]
2 If it was that easy, it would have long been done. So far the restriction stays alive because nobody figured out a reasonable way of dealing with it. 2 If it was that easy, it would have long been done. So far the restriction stays alive because nobody figured out a reasonable way of dealing with it.
3 \n 3 \n
4 That, however, is no excuse to add more of those. 4 That, however, is no excuse to add more of those.
5 \n 5 \n
6 [quote] They fucked up the sea balance to a state even worse than before?[/quote] 6 [quote] They fucked up the sea balance to a state even worse than before?[/quote]
7 The current state of sea is not final. 7 The current state of sea is not final.
8 \n 8 \n
9 [quote]that absolutely would be a fair argument[/quote] 9 [quote]that absolutely would be a fair argument[/quote]
10 Unfortunately, that doesn't fly. Also giving bombers 90% armour vs ground weapons doesn't work either. 10 Unfortunately, that doesn't fly. Also giving bombers 90% armour vs ground weapons doesn't work either.
11 \n 11 \n
12 [quote] .... it is also a hard restriction.... [/quote] 12 [quote] .... it is also a hard restriction.... [/quote]
13 Good luck with that. 13 Good luck with that.
14 \n 14 \n
15 [quote] I'm uncertain, but you seem to be in favour of removing air as a distinct category entirely? [/quote] 15 [quote] I'm uncertain, but you seem to be in favour of removing air as a distinct category entirely? [/quote]
16 Not just air, all "categories".
17 \n
16 I'm in favour of having the game determined by its physics. Air being a special restriction currently leads to things like fighters being able to attack landed gunships, but unable hit things sitting right next to them. 18 I'm in favour of having the game determined by its physics. Air being a special restriction currently leads to things like fighters being able to attack landed gunships, but unable hit things sitting right next to them.
17 \n 19 \n
18 You are asking to introduce [u]more[/u] of such nonsense cases. Like Faradays being unable to attack landed planes. 20 You are asking to introduce [u]more[/u] of such nonsense cases. Like Faradays being unable to attack landed planes.