Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Would you be in favor of a "simple" zerok?

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
9/2/2013 1:35:36 PMNLrank[GBC]Tandstickor before revert after revert
9/2/2013 1:32:15 PMNLrank[GBC]Tandstickor before revert after revert
9/2/2013 1:32:04 PMNLrank[GBC]Tandstickor before revert after revert
9/2/2013 1:31:46 PMNLrank[GBC]Tandstickor before revert after revert
Before After
1 SK (Simle K) 1 SK (Simle K)
2 \n 2 \n
3 I like the idea actually, just as an experiment. Just go do it Batman! 3 I like the idea actually, just as an experiment. Just go do it Batman!
4 \n 4 \n
5 [quote]If you are going to do this, I'd recommend also reducing the number of static defense structures to Lotus, Defender, Stinger, Urchin, and Hacksaw. Stardust may prove necessary, but I'm not sure it would necessarily be so, so I'd start without it. [/quote] 5 [quote]If you are going to do this, I'd recommend also reducing the number of static defense structures to Lotus, Defender, Stinger, Urchin, and Hacksaw. Stardust may prove necessary, but I'm not sure it would necessarily be so, so I'd start without it. [/quote]
6 \n 6 \n
7 I'd make 1000 smurfs to +1000 this 7 I'd make 1000 smurfs to +1000 this
8 \n
9 On stardusts: 220 in LLTs is almost as good and scales a lot better.