Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Too much smurfing

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
12/3/2012 2:16:25 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
12/3/2012 2:15:29 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]So how does this prevent me from trolling on the ranked server excactly? I can team up with some randoms and troll the entire game. No difference to zero-k. [/quote] 1 [quote]So how does this prevent me from trolling on the ranked server excactly? I can team up with some randoms and troll the entire game. No difference to zero-k. [/quote]
2 It provides you an option not to. 2 It provides you an option not to.
3 \n 3 \n
4 In zk atm, it's either smurf - or lose elo without really losing skill. 4 In zk atm, it's either smurf - or lose elo without really losing skill.
5 \n 5 \n
6 And you probably will agree, that wasting elo because of desire to play a non-serious game in non-serious way will dump said stat sufficiently to cause significant failure of balance, smurf or not. 6 And you probably will agree, that wasting elo because of desire to play a non-serious game in non-serious way will dump said stat sufficiently to cause significant failure of balance, smurf or not.
7 \n 7 \n
8 [quote] And as I said I did not feel 250 elo difference has made winning much easier. [/quote] 8 [quote] And as I said I did not feel 250 elo difference has made winning much easier. [/quote]
9 Then why worry about smurfs? Most these guys escalate to within that margin of their real elo in a day or so. 9 Then why worry about smurfs? Most these guys escalate to within that margin of their real elo in a day or so.
10 \n
11 (i'm not talking about ban-circumventing single-use accounts here, but stuff like tickman/warlok and tandstickor/llIl)