| 1 |
You're not wrong, its just that most of us already know that, but the lobsterpot is still a thing. People just enjoy playing huge-ass games in spite of knowing that it breaks the game's economy.
|
1 |
You're not wrong, its just that most of us already know that, but the lobsterpot is still a thing. People just enjoy playing huge-ass games in spite of knowing that it breaks the game's economy.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
I'd prefer slightly smaller games myself. 8v8 would be a decent maximum, but people prefer to make a spectator pile than to shuffle over to a different room so... we stick to lobsterpots.
|
3 |
I'd prefer slightly smaller games myself. 8v8 would be a decent maximum, but people prefer to make a spectator pile than to shuffle over to a different room so... we stick to lobsterpots.
|
|
|
4 |
\n
|
|
|
5 |
I should note that, in addition to the curve you described, all commanders also bring a vanguard econ module into the game at start. So higher player densities also mean a smaller difference between starting and final metal incomes.
|
Commentary on big vs small teams economy/playstyle