| 1 |
[quote]Just as an aside I currently sit at #6 on casual. Neither myself nor Spark ever played a lobster pot team game - it was all FFA and a small handful of duels. I wouldn't know the first thing about how to play in the lobster pot. So I guess we're meant to just all understand that casual rating means "Could be (un)skilled at ... anything".[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]Just as an aside I currently sit at #6 on casual. Neither myself nor Spark ever played a lobster pot team game - it was all FFA and a small handful of duels. I wouldn't know the first thing about how to play in the lobster pot. So I guess we're meant to just all understand that casual rating means "Could be (un)skilled at ... anything".[/quote]
|
| 2 |
Your
account
would
be
a
very
rare
exception.
.
.
and
I
doubt
you'd
play
below
dark-blue
level
at
worst
in
a
team
game
anyway.
Sufficient
competence
at
managing
your
economy
and
units
goes
a
long
way,
much
further
than
an
understanding
of
team-game-specific
jank.
|
2 |
Your
account
would
be
a
very
rare
exception.
.
.
assuming
that
you
actually
*would*
be
meaningfully
worse
at
team
games,
which
I'm
not
at
all
sure
you
would
be.
Sufficient
competence
at
managing
your
economy
and
units
goes
a
long
way,
much
further
than
an
understanding
of
team-game-specific
jank.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
[quote]@DeinFreund and @Kingstad are both FFA regulars. You're right it's not most top players. Just the ones in charge of the system.[/quote]
|
4 |
[quote]@DeinFreund and @Kingstad are both FFA regulars. You're right it's not most top players. Just the ones in charge of the system.[/quote]
|
| 5 |
It's true that they both play a fair bit of FFA but I don't think their rating substantially misrepresents their skill as teamgame players.
|
5 |
It's true that they both play a fair bit of FFA but I don't think their rating substantially misrepresents their skill as teamgame players.
|
Award ladder changes