Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Sea is boring

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
12/3/2019 3:33:29 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
12/3/2019 3:32:29 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
12/3/2019 3:30:09 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
12/3/2019 3:24:27 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]There's no eco to raid since all eco is built on land, there's no strategic terrain to control since everything is flat water[/quote] 1 [quote]There's no eco to raid since all eco is built on land, there's no strategic terrain to control since everything is flat water[/quote]
2 IMO most of these maps should just not exist or get played on, but people really like their Small Supreme * for some reason despite it consistently playing poorly... not to mention Sapphire Shore Duo or Sail Away. 2 IMO most of these maps should just not exist or get played on, but people really like their Small Supreme * for some reason despite it consistently playing poorly... not to mention Sapphire Shore Duo or Sail Away.
3 \n 3 \n
4 For instance I would expect Aurelian and Bellicose Islands to play much more reasonably. However, neither of these maps have been played in team games for upwards of two months. I am left with the question of whether the community at large *wants* to play reasonable sea games or whether they actually *prefer* the kind of games being derided in this thread. 4 For instance I would expect Aurelian and Bellicose Islands to play much more reasonably. However, neither of these maps have been played in team games for upwards of two months. I am left with the question of whether the community at large *wants* to play what I would consider reasonable sea games or whether they actually *prefer* the kind of games being derided in this thread.