1 |
This
is
simply
an
overhyped
dynamic
camo
system,
not
a
cloaking
device.
The
science
behind
it
is
corrent,
but
the
actual
advantages
over
normal
stealth
patterns
are
probably
modest
at
best,
especially
with
moving
targets
and
objects
like
trees
in
the
background.
|
1 |
This
is
simply
an
overhyped
dynamic
camo
system,
not
a
cloaking
device.
The
science
behind
it
is
correct,
but
the
actual
advantages
over
normal
stealth
patterns
are
probably
modest
at
best,
especially
with
moving
targets
and
objects
like
trees
in
the
background.
|
2 |
If
you
wanted
to
be
difficult
to
see
in
a
featureless
desert,
it
would
replace
your
normal
image
with
mothing
but
a
slight
blur
-
for
no
cost
but
carrying
around
a
big
plastic
sheet
in
front
of
you,
that
also
obstructs
your
vision.
But
in
more
complex
terrain,
the
efficiency
degrades
to
something
only
slightly
better
than
normal
army
camo
patterns.
If
you
are
not
looking
closely,
you
could
still
miss
someone
hiding
close
to
you,
but
in
most
cases
the
inconvenience
of
having
to
hold
the
plastic
sheet
1m
away
from
you
at
all
times
(
and
the
effect
being
directional
unless
you
carry
a
whole
1m
radius
tube
around
you)
makes
it
pretty
useless
in
most
practical
cases.
|
2 |
If
you
wanted
to
be
difficult
to
see
in
a
featureless
desert,
it
would
replace
your
normal
image
with
nothing
but
a
slight
blur
-
for
no
cost
but
carrying
around
a
big
plastic
sheet
in
front
of
you,
that
also
obstructs
your
vision.
But
in
more
complex
terrain,
the
efficiency
degrades
to
something
only
slightly
better
than
normal
army
camo
patterns.
If
you
are
not
looking
closely,
you
could
still
miss
someone
hiding
close
to
you,
but
in
most
cases
the
inconvenience
of
having
to
hold
the
plastic
sheet
1m
away
from
you
at
all
times
(
and
the
effect
being
directional
unless
you
carry
a
whole
1m
radius
tube
around
you)
makes
it
pretty
useless
in
most
practical
cases.
|