Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Current state of the Bandit

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
3/24/2012 5:48:29 PMUSrankAntelope before revert after revert
Before After
1 >Tand is #6 on the ladder and a good player, so don't dismiss his opinion here. 1 >Tand is #6 on the ladder and a good player, so don't dismiss his opinion here.
2 \n 2 \n
3 Well, first he is doing balance around 1v1. 1v1 is good, but it ignores much of the meta-game of team games. The majority of players play in medium-to-large teamgames. 3 Well, first he is doing balance around 1v1. 1v1 is good, but it ignores much of the meta-game of team games. The majority of players play in medium-to-large teamgames.
4 \n 4 \n
5 Secondly, could Bandit be slightly imba? Sure. Is it worth fretting over? Nah. It's close enough and ZK has other bigger issues to worry about. 5 Secondly, could Bandit be slightly imba? Sure. Is it worth fretting over? Nah. It's close enough and ZK has other bigger issues to worry about.
6 \n 6 \n
7 As is said every time a "unit is OP" thread comes up, abuse the hell out of it until it is blatantly obvious that is needs balance changing. Many of the current buffs and nerfs have come as a direct result of a single unit being used abusively. I was a heavy influence in getting Hammer and Com Nano nerfed because I abused them every*single*game. 7 As is said every time a "unit is OP" thread comes up, abuse the hell out of it until it is blatantly obvious that it needs balance changing. Many of the current buffs and nerfs have come as a direct result of a single unit being used abusively. I was a heavy influence in getting Hammer and Com Nano nerfed because I abused them every*single*game.
8 \n 8 \n
9 \n 9 \n