| 1 |
> Some maps are just terrible game-play wise.
|
1 |
> Some maps are just terrible game-play wise.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
Opinions vary a lot though... I mean, you want to add Titan, Iceland and Coagulation, and I think the prevailing opinion is that these maps have never played well in 1v1.
|
3 |
Opinions vary a lot though... I mean, you want to add Titan, Iceland and Coagulation, and I think the prevailing opinion is that these maps have never played well in 1v1.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
Quicksilver
would
make
my
list
if
it
were
symmetric.
Into
Battle
is
fine
as
far
as
I'm
concerned.
Hide
and
Seek
was
disliked
but
it
could
come
back
sometime.
I
have
reservations
about
Cold
Snap's
combination
of
mountains
and
flat
land
in
1v1
but
maybe
it
would
work.
|
5 |
Quicksilver
would
make
my
list
if
it
were
symmetric.
Into
Battle
is
fine
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
although
its
startboxes
might
still
need
fixing?
Hide
and
Seek
was
disliked
but
it
could
come
back
sometime.
I
have
reservations
about
Cold
Snap's
combination
of
mountains
and
flat
land
in
1v1
but
maybe
it
would
work.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
The definitive standard-play Zero-K map is probably TitanDuel or perhaps Red Comet.
|
7 |
The definitive standard-play Zero-K map is probably TitanDuel or perhaps Red Comet.
|
Matchmaker map rotation system