| 1 |
[quote]How to reproduce it? How about literally any game with a kodachi ever. You send them into enemy base, click on mex and it will fire at whatever comes into range first.
|
1 |
[quote]How to reproduce it? How about literally any game with a kodachi ever. You send them into enemy base, click on mex and it will fire at whatever comes into range first.
|
| 2 |
[/quote]
|
2 |
[/quote]
|
| 3 |
I
think
this
is
a
different
thing
when
it
shoots
at
a
target
of
opportunity
when
designated
target
is
not
yet
in
reach.
That
is
what
holdfire
is
for.
I
don't
care
for
that.
|
3 |
I
think
this
is
a
different
thing
when
it
shoots
at
a
target
of
opportunity
when
designated
target
is
not
yet
in
reach.
That
is
what
holdfire
is
for.
I
don't
care
for
that
in
the
slightest
and
i
think
both
you
and
@Fealthas
are
missing
the
point
by
conflating
these
issues.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
It's another thing where it ignores a designated target in favor of a target of opportunity when both are in range and in clear sight.
|
5 |
It's another thing where it ignores a designated target in favor of a target of opportunity when both are in range and in clear sight.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
[quote]I command a Pyro to specifically target a Lotus, instead it targets a windmill. I reissued the order and it moved on to shooting the mex instead. [/quote]
|
7 |
[quote]I command a Pyro to specifically target a Lotus, instead it targets a windmill. I reissued the order and it moved on to shooting the mex instead. [/quote]
|
| 8 |
Not having watched the replay, it sounds to me like the case of Pyro ignoring the target order. Pyros are not long-reload units, so wasting a few flame bursts on targets of opportunity before the designated target became shootable would not have been critical.
|
8 |
Not having watched the replay, it sounds to me like the case of Pyro ignoring the target order. Pyros are not long-reload units, so wasting a few flame bursts on targets of opportunity before the designated target became shootable would not have been critical.
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
But shooting targets of opportunity *instead* of the designated Lotus sounds exactly like what @Jazcash describes.
|
10 |
But shooting targets of opportunity *instead* of the designated Lotus sounds exactly like what @Jazcash describes.
|
| 11 |
\n
|
11 |
\n
|
| 12 |
The other difference is that shooting targets of opportunity on fire-at-will is the expected behaviour. Ignoring manually issued targets which are in range is not the expected behaviour.
|
12 |
The other difference is that shooting targets of opportunity on fire-at-will is the expected behaviour. Ignoring manually issued targets which are in range is not the expected behaviour.
|
| 13 |
\n
|
13 |
\n
|
B541653 2 on Ravaged_v2 (Multiplayer)