Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Help! I'm overrated!

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
1/27/2018 7:25:16 PMCHrankAdminDeinFreund before revert after revert
1/27/2018 7:24:42 PMCHrankAdminDeinFreund before revert after revert
1/27/2018 7:12:38 PMCHrankAdminDeinFreund before revert after revert
1/27/2018 7:12:26 PMCHrankAdminDeinFreund before revert after revert
1/27/2018 7:08:11 PMCHrankAdminDeinFreund before revert after revert
1/27/2018 7:07:40 PMCHrankAdminDeinFreund before revert after revert
1/27/2018 7:05:53 PMCHrankAdminDeinFreund before revert after revert
1/27/2018 7:05:38 PMCHrankAdminDeinFreund before revert after revert
Before After
1 Casual rating is general rating, not team game rating. Rating is a lot about statistics and unfortunately there is a very strong correlation between good 1v1 play and good team play, uncoupling team games from 1v1 would make balance worse for most players. 1 Casual rating is general rating, not team game rating. Rating is a lot about statistics and unfortunately there is a very strong correlation between good 1v1 play and good team play, uncoupling team games from 1v1 would make balance worse for most players.
2 \n 2 \n
3 Thanks to your sacrifice, Zero-K lobsters are now winning more than ever! 3 Thanks to your sacrifice, Zero-K lobsters are now winning more than ever!
4 \n 4 \n
5 [size=2]PS: Don't smurf if you don't want your rating jumping around like a lobster in a hot bowl. There's no way to escape the elo hell that is team games anyway.[/size] 5 [size=2]PS: Don't smurf if you don't want your rating jumping around like a lobster in a hot bowl. There's no way to escape the elo hell that is team games anyway.[/size]
6 \n 6 \n
7 Edit: Just to clarify why rating team games independently is pointless. I've compared ratings taken purely from 1v1 games vs ratings taken purely from team games and the 1v1 ratings were better at predicting both the 1v1 and the team games! 7 Edit: Just to clarify why rating team games independently is pointless. I've compared ratings taken purely from 1v1 games vs ratings taken purely from team games and the 1v1 ratings were better at predicting both the 1v1 and the team games!
8 \n 8 \n
9 When it comes to accurately rating players, there's no point having more than a single, combined rating. Even including games on trollmaps improves the rating accuracy. The "1v1" ( Matchmaker) rating is only there as a bragging rating really and doesn't include casual games so you don't have to worry about losing brag points. If MM popularity increases the rating should become more meaningful. Why do you think there should be a team game rating? 9 When it comes to accurately rating players, there's no point having more than a single, combined rating. Even including games on trollmaps improves the rating accuracy. The "1v1" ( Matchmaker) rating is only there as a bragging rating really and doesn't include casual games so you don't have to worry about losing brag points. If MM popularity increases, the rating should become more meaningful. Why do you think there should be a team game rating?