1 |
[quote]Assume you only build a defender and then scout: You lose to enemy who builds mexes because you have no mexes.[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]Assume you only build a defender and then scout: You lose to enemy who builds mexes because you have no mexes.[/quote]
|
2 |
I think this doesn't cost you that many mexes that you automatically lose if you do it. You're on a back foot, sure, but there are ways to catch up. Especially given that some kind of token defense on your base is a necessity anyway.
|
2 |
I think this doesn't cost you that many mexes that you automatically lose if you do it. You're on a back foot, sure, but there are ways to catch up. Especially given that some kind of token defense on your base is a necessity anyway.
|
3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
4 |
In effect, comparing this to a somewhat usual build order, you're changing mex-mex-mex-solar-solar-lotus to picket-mex-mex-mex-solar-solar.
|
4 |
In effect, comparing this to a somewhat usual build order, you're changing mex-mex-mex-solar-solar-lotus to picket-mex-mex-mex-solar-solar.
|
5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
6 |
Of course, that math only works if that picket actually does something to stop Blastwings. And it's still blind, which is stupid.
|
6 |
Of course, that math only works if that picket actually does something to stop Blastwings. And it's still blind, which is stupid.
|
7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
8 |
---
|
8 |
---
|
9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
10 |
Are
com
drops
practical?
I'd
think
their
exorbitant
cost
and
low
success
rate
should
make
them
a
very
rare
thing.
|
10 |
Are
com
drops
practical?
I'd
think
their
exorbitant
cost
(
vindi,
morph,
and
income
lost
while
com
is
in
vindi)
and
their
low
success
rate
should
make
them
a
very
rare
thing.
|