Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

B393174 20 on AquariusCrossing (Multiplayer)

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
1/5/2016 4:51:15 PMGBrank[GBC]1v0ry_k1ng before revert after revert
1/5/2016 3:49:00 PMGBrank[GBC]1v0ry_k1ng before revert after revert
1/5/2016 3:48:38 PMGBrank[GBC]1v0ry_k1ng before revert after revert
1/5/2016 3:47:51 PMGBrank[GBC]1v0ry_k1ng before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]It is predictable weapon that serves its main purpose (killing porc) pretty well, but at the same time doesn't hit mobile units that reliably so its role stays limited.[/quote] 1 [quote]It is predictable weapon that serves its main purpose (killing porc) pretty well, but at the same time doesn't hit mobile units that reliably so its role stays limited.[/quote]
2 Killing porc/shore bombardment is what the Battleship is supposed to do. The Reef is supposed to spam drones, which are accurate + high DPS units effective against mobile units but (theoretically) weak to AA. Giving the Reef the means to then remove the fixed AA itself is bad as it means the Reef has the counter to the defence that is supposed to counter it. 2 Killing porc/shore bombardment is what the Battleship is supposed to do. The Reef is supposed to spam drones, which are accurate + high DPS units effective against mobile units but (theoretically) weak to AA. Giving the Reef the means to then remove the fixed AA itself is bad as it means the Reef has the counter to the defence that is supposed to counter it.
3 \n 3 \n
4 The drones themselves could do with comparison stat-wise to the funnyweb drones - atm they seem much better, 4 The drones themselves could do with comparison stat-wise to the funnyweb drones - atm they seem better.