| 1 |
Scissor is by far the worst. Wolverine can make the game painful to watch or play, but it's fragile, and Firewalker is snipable due to high weight.
|
1 |
Scissor is by far the worst. Wolverine can make the game painful to watch or play, but it's fragile, and Firewalker is snipable due to high weight.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
I've done some comparing of Scissor to Moderator. Both have 10s reload, but Scissor is cheaper, faster, tankier(!), has more range, damage and aoe(!!!). Some of this should go.
|
3 |
I've done some comparing of Scissor to Moderator. Both have 10s reload, but Scissor is cheaper, faster, tankier(!), has more range, damage and aoe(!!!). Some of this should go.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
The
list
of
bss
here
is
incomplete.
I
would
add
Buoy,
and
technically
Felon
is
just
as
superbad,
but
it's
such
a
long
accepted
kind
of
superbad
that
noone
even
considers
Felon
being
part
of
the
standard
RPS.
Buoy
isn't
as
bad
as
fw/wolverine/shear
|
5 |
The
list
of
bss
here
is
incomplete.
I
would
add
Buoy,
and
technically
Felon
is
just
as
superbad,
but
it's
such
a
long
accepted
kind
of
superbad
that
noone
even
considers
Felon
being
part
of
the
standard
RPS.
Buoy
isn't
as
bad
as
fw/wolverine/scissor.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
I can imagine contingencies for most of these things. Scissor could lose tracking efficiency or AoE. Buoy could lose projectile speed or slow (and gain damage?). Firewalker could have a higher arc, nerfing its leveler sidearm while not harming its shield-busting sidearm. Wolverine though, i have no idea.
|
7 |
I can imagine contingencies for most of these things. Scissor could lose tracking efficiency or AoE. Buoy could lose projectile speed or slow (and gain damage?). Firewalker could have a higher arc, nerfing its leveler sidearm while not harming its shield-busting sidearm. Wolverine though, i have no idea.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
But then in low-medium densities, Wolverines aren't that invulnerable to raiders; they become invulnerable largely not because of mines and long range, but because they fuel porc/arty standoffs, and they're superb in those situations (until Firewalker, of course).
|
9 |
But then in low-medium densities, Wolverines aren't that invulnerable to raiders; they become invulnerable largely not because of mines and long range, but because they fuel porc/arty standoffs, and they're superb in those situations (until Firewalker, of course).
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
Buoys aren't that nasty either, but i dislike how they make the raider/skirmisher situation [i]soft[/i]. I like the hard counter raiders provide against the normal skirmishers.
|
11 |
Buoys aren't that nasty either, but i dislike how they make the raider/skirmisher situation [i]soft[/i]. I like the hard counter raiders provide against the normal skirmishers.
|
"Skirmisher" discussion