| 1 |
The
designated
role
of
'eco'
is
interesting.
On
one
hand,
it
seems
to
majorly
let
your
team
down
by
not
providing
any
troops
->
giving
opponents
map
control
and
the
mex
that
comes
with
it.
On
the
other
hand,
you've
got
a
perfect
example
of
someone
(
@Nyararan)
who
got
to
1900
team
elo
pretty
much
entirely
through
ecoing
for
his
team.
|
1 |
The
designated
role
of
'eco'
is
interesting.
On
one
hand,
it
seems
to
majorly
let
your
team
down
by
not
providing
any
troops
->
giving
opponents
map
control
and
the
mex
that
comes
with
it.
On
the
other
hand,
you've
got
a
perfect
example
of
someone
(
@nyararan)
who
got
to
1900
team
elo
pretty
much
entirely
through
ecoing
for
his
team.
|
| 3 |
I think that there's no room for a dedicated eco role in highly competent teams, but when you're playing with a bunch of no-eco ham or porc lords, there is a hole in your team's strategy that needs filling, so ecoing is a great thing to do. Most big teams players fit this description -> ecoing for your team is quite appropriate and will gain you elo often, particularly if you were low elo to begin with.
|
3 |
I think that there's no room for a dedicated eco role in highly competent teams, but when you're playing with a bunch of no-eco ham or porc lords, there is a hole in your team's strategy that needs filling, so ecoing is a great thing to do. Most big teams players fit this description -> ecoing for your team is quite appropriate and will gain you elo often, particularly if you were low elo to begin with.
|
ECO