| 1 |
Well if "Yogzototh pointing stuff out acted as [a warning]" and @mojjj still got the punishment, then the warning had no purpose.
|
1 |
Well if "Yogzototh pointing stuff out acted as [a warning]" and @mojjj still got the punishment, then the warning had no purpose.
|
| 2 |
Just to make this clear, would he still have received his demotion if he was logged in at the proper time? (Speaking of which, he was online 2 days ago and 36 hours ago, judging by the games he played. His thread was, what, half a week ago?)
|
2 |
Just to make this clear, would he still have received his demotion if he was logged in at the proper time? (Speaking of which, he was online 2 days ago and 36 hours ago, judging by the games he played. His thread was, what, half a week ago?)
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
My concern is that I'm not getting the impression that the decision to demote @mojjj evolved from a consent among the admins. In particular, these things don't add up for me:
|
4 |
My concern is that I'm not getting the impression that the decision to demote @mojjj evolved from a consent among the admins. In particular, these things don't add up for me:
|
| 5 |
1. Apparently a warning seemed sufficient, yet @mojjj was demoted without further notice.
|
5 |
1. Apparently a warning seemed sufficient, yet @mojjj was demoted without further notice.
|
| 6 |
2. The warning was not given on grounds of lacking communication channels, although a public warning and this (inevitable) thread have qualitatively the same levels of public shaming. If that was your concern.
|
6 |
2. The warning was not given on grounds of lacking communication channels, although a public warning and this (inevitable) thread have qualitatively the same levels of public shaming. If that was your concern.
|
| 7 |
3. In addition, @mojjj was logged in multiple times since the "incident", leaving ample opportunity for a warning. But despite a lack of periculum in mora (from what I can tell), a sudden decision was made and action was taken, leading to point 1.
|
7 |
3. In addition, @mojjj was logged in multiple times since the "incident", leaving ample opportunity for a warning. But despite a lack of periculum in mora (from what I can tell), a sudden decision was made and action was taken, leading to point 1.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
I
lack
(
internal?)
information
to
complete
the
picture
here,
maybe
the
decision
process
could
be
elaborated
a
bit
more?
|
9 |
I
lack
(
internal?)
information
to
complete
the
picture
here,
maybe
the
decision
process
could
be
elaborated
on
a
bit
more?
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
Also, if you punish repeated offenders harder (no discussion about that in this thread please), I think an (afaict) long time admin like @mojjj would deserve a warning shot and not immediate termination. It's not like there was [i]actual[/i] harm done.
|
11 |
Also, if you punish repeated offenders harder (no discussion about that in this thread please), I think an (afaict) long time admin like @mojjj would deserve a warning shot and not immediate termination. It's not like there was [i]actual[/i] harm done.
|
Admin status