| 1 |
@ArchShaman
|
1 |
@ArchShaman
|
| 2 |
>> Remember: It will be highly frustrating for those with a false positive (eg: was a temporary spike in useage) to be forced to spectate. Is this worth the frustration it may cause for all people?
|
2 |
>> Remember: It will be highly frustrating for those with a false positive (eg: was a temporary spike in useage) to be forced to spectate. Is this worth the frustration it may cause for all people?
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
my proposed solution can handle this.
|
4 |
my proposed solution can handle this.
|
| 5 |
we
give
player
a
time
to
solve
his
temporary
lag
spike
problem,
we
even
give
him
a
chance
to
pause
a
game
if
community
want
to
wait
for
him
to
solve
his
problem(
in
cases
when
it
takes
more
than
60
seconds)
.
|
5 |
we
give
player
a
time
to
solve
his
temporary
lag
spike
problem,
we
even
give
him
a
chance
to
pause
a
game
if
community
wants
to
wait
for
him
to
solve
his
problem(
in
cases
when
it
takes
more
than
60
seconds)
.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
Now it's frustrating for _everyone_ when someone turns their game into chess...
|
7 |
Now it's frustrating for _everyone_ when someone turns their game into chess...
|
Why 10 are being punished instead of 1?