| 1 |
[quote] Funny, but poor comparison. No-one is claiming structures are UP or feel wrong.[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote] Funny, but poor comparison. No-one is claiming structures are UP or feel wrong.[/quote]
|
| 2 |
Thing is that you are proposing to add a hard targeting restriction. I was just extrapolating your argumentation.
|
2 |
Thing is that you are proposing to add a hard targeting restriction. I was just extrapolating your argumentation.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
|
|
4 |
Bottom line, things like special damages and hard targeting restrictions are not only boring, but also very much against what ZK stands for. Thus the chances of such solution of ever being implemented are close to zero.
|
|
|
5 |
\n
|
| 4 |
[quote] What?[/quote]
|
6 |
[quote] What?[/quote]
|
| 5 |
... is a command that spawns a Kestrel. Try it. Needs cheats.
|
7 |
... is a command that spawns a Kestrel. Try it. Needs cheats.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 7 |
[quote]I'm not comfortable with one of the two low-weigth options being mainly anti-heavy. Early planes should be worse against coms and better against smaller units. [/quote]
|
9 |
[quote]I'm not comfortable with one of the two low-weigth options being mainly anti-heavy. Early planes should be worse against coms and better against smaller units. [/quote]
|
| 8 |
Where did you read "antiheavy" in "an accurate anti-unit Kestrel missile strike bomber"? :|
|
10 |
Where did you read "antiheavy" in "an accurate anti-unit Kestrel missile strike bomber"? :|
|
Air fac is no fun anymore :(