1 |
[quote]I ofter see 6vs6s where its 6 av players vs 3 top and 3 lowest. in 90% of such a games latter team wins. Becasue its pro who carry on the team, not the noob. 1 pro can own 2 av players in most of the times. When he's assited by newb its even easier. [/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]I ofter see 6vs6s where its 6 av players vs 3 top and 3 lowest. in 90% of such a games latter team wins. Becasue its pro who carry on the team, not the noob. 1 pro can own 2 av players in most of the times. When he's assited by newb its even easier. [/quote]
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
[quote]A pro with two nabs will invaiably lose to three average players. Its a very unfun matchup for the pro.[/quote]
|
3 |
[quote]A pro with two nabs will invaiably lose to three average players. Its a very unfun matchup for the pro.[/quote]
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
Wow, can you make up your minds? So are teams with higher elo variance good or bad, after all?
|
5 |
Wow, can you make up your minds? So are teams with higher elo variance good or bad, after all?
|
|
|
6 |
\n
|
|
|
7 |
[quote]Its just a win/lose ratio. [/quote]
|
|
|
8 |
Wow, do you even know how elo works? Given enough fair games (!predict gives 50%) everyone's win/loss will be very, very close to 50%. That's the whole point of balance.
|
|
|
9 |
\n
|
|
|
10 |
If someone has 60% wins in team games, it means his elo is too low, and it gets adjusted higher, as result he gets matched with noobs, and loses a bit more, eventually resulting in 50% winrate.
|