| 1 |
@Forever , you are saying it like there are always multiple "other players" who can set up the counterbalance. As i have said, one player may forfeit their chance to win the game by allying with the strongest player and settling for 2nd place. No backstabbing, plain "i help you win, you let me have second place".
|
1 |
@Forever , you are saying it like there are always multiple "other players" who can set up the counterbalance. As i have said, one player may forfeit their chance to win the game by allying with the strongest player and settling for 2nd place. No backstabbing, plain "i help you win, you let me have second place".
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
Imagine a situation:
|
3 |
Imagine a situation:
|
| 4 |
There are three players. Player 1 is dominating and will probably win even against 2v1. Player 2 is struggling against player 1. Player 3 is very weak.
|
4 |
There are three players. Player 1 is dominating and will probably win even against 2v1. Player 2 is struggling against player 1. Player 3 is very weak.
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
With "All losers are equal", player 3 would team up with player 2 and fight together against player 1 for a small chance to win.
|
6 |
With "All losers are equal", player 3 would team up with player 2 and fight together against player 1 for a small chance to win.
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
But with "last to die is gets second place", player 3 can team up with player 1. They crush player 2, and then player 3 gives up. Player 3, the weakest one, now has second place. Sure, he lost his chance to win, but instead he got a guaranteed second place.
|
8 |
But with "last to die is gets second place", player 3 can team up with player 1. They crush player 2, and then player 3 gives up. Player 3, the weakest one, now has second place. Sure, he lost his chance to win, but instead he got a guaranteed second place.
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
[quote]you must say it in chat so all will know[/quote]
|
10 |
[quote]you must say it in chat so all will know[/quote]
|
| 11 |
How is this going to be ruled out? Smart players can assess threats an team up organically without ever communicating at all.
|
11 |
How is this going to be ruled out? Smart players can assess threats an team up organically without ever communicating at all.
|
| 12 |
How
do
you
prove
some
players
have
"teamed
up"?
And
what
does
that
"team
up"
bring
anyway?
|
12 |
How
do
you
prove
some
players
have
"teamed
up"?
And
what
does
that
official
declaration
of
"teaming
up"
bring
anyway?
|
| 13 |
\n
|
13 |
\n
|
| 14 |
You do not need any formal rules regarding diplomacy. Alliances and other diplomatic relations occur naturally when decent players play FFA.
|
14 |
You do not need any formal rules regarding diplomacy. Alliances and other diplomatic relations occur naturally when decent players play FFA.
|
FFA TOURNEY