Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

AA vs bombers

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
2/24/2014 12:34:38 PMGBrank[GBC]1v0ry_k1ng before revert after revert
Before After
1 agree re: chainsaw, but thats still 900m. Razkiss is effective and the emp turret is short range/situational 1 agree re: chainsaw, but thats still 900m. Razkiss is largely ineffective and the emp turret is short range/situational
2 \n 2 \n
3 I think it might be a good idea to take a look at AA relationships to planes. specifically: 3 I think it might be a good idea to take a look at AA relationships to planes. specifically:
4 \n 4 \n
5 1) bring the hacksaw back in as affordable bomber deterent. 5 1) bring the hacksaw back in as affordable bomber deterent.
6 2) increase the alpha (not DPS) of the lighter existing mobile 'missile' AA, specifically crasher & vandal. 6 2) increase the alpha (not DPS) of the lighter existing mobile 'missile' AA, specifically crasher & vandal.
7 \n 7 \n
8 I think the Jethro, Cobra, archangel & flail are already pretty valid responses to planes. Jethro less so, buts its other strengths prophibit further buff. 8 I think the Jethro, Cobra, archangel & flail are already pretty valid responses to planes. Jethro less so, buts its other strengths prophibit further buff.
9 \n 9 \n