Post edit history
Countering the shieldball, the most anti-fun thing in the game
| Before | After | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [quote]The (hypothetical) shieldball in question contains: | 1 | [quote]The (hypothetical) shieldball in question contains: |
| 2 | 1 felon | 2 | 1 felon |
| 3 | 4 aspises | 3 | 4 aspises |
| 4 | 2 outlaws | 4 | 2 outlaws |
| 5 | 10 bandits | 5 | 10 bandits |
| 6 | 4 racketeers | 6 | 4 racketeers |
| 7 | 5 thugs | 7 | 5 thugs |
| 8 | 1 fusion | 8 | 1 fusion |
| 9 | [/quote] | 9 | [/quote] |
| 10 | You keep talking about needing massive armies of stilettos to disarm that. You need 1. Even with racketeers in there, one stiletto can disarm such a shieldball. Source, just checked in /godmode. Also, same cost in ravagers absolutely massacres this shieldball. Or same cost in any of the counters I mentioned really(excluding crawling bombs, that'd be silly). | 10 | You keep talking about needing massive armies of stilettos to disarm that. You need 1. Even with racketeers in there, one stiletto can disarm such a shieldball. Source, just checked in /godmode. Also, same cost in ravagers absolutely massacres this shieldball. Or same cost in any of the counters I mentioned really(excluding crawling bombs, that'd be silly). |
| 11 | \n | 11 | \n |
| 12 | [quote]Racketeers counter Ravagers and moderators pretty well. [/quote] | 12 | [quote]Racketeers counter Ravagers and moderators pretty well. [/quote] |
| 13 | Racketeer costs more than ravager or moderator. . . | 13 | Racketeer costs more than ravager or moderator. . . not to mention they get worse with numbers due to wasting their reload on the first target which enters their range. . . they're basically suicidal to make vs ravager spam. |