| 1 |
KNORKER YOU HONK!!
|
1 |
KNORKER YOU HONK!!
|
| 2 |
Poll 101: #1 Do not add OR options to a poll.
|
2 |
Poll 101: #1 Do not add OR options to a poll.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
Where are the 7v7, 8v8, 9v9, 10v10, 11v11 options?
|
4 |
Where are the 7v7, 8v8, 9v9, 10v10, 11v11 options?
|
| 5 |
[quote]a
limit
larger
than
6v6
would
have
none
of
the
(
hopefully
positive)
effects
of
smaller
teamsizes.
[/quote]
That's
wrong.
8v8
has
better
FPS
and
less
clusterfuck
as
a
12v12
(
current
max
I
think)
.
I
want
a
max
somewhere
around
8v8
to
10v9
(
split
at
20)
,
because
6v6
is
not
enough
for
a
room
split.
Splitting
into
3v3
or
3v4
means
rooms
die
too
fast.
4v4s
and
above
seem
pretty
stable.
|
5 |
[quote]a
limit
larger
than
6v6
would
have
none
of
the
(
hopefully
positive)
effects
of
smaller
teamsizes.
[/quote]
That's
wrong.
8v8
has
better
FPS
and
less
clusterfuck
than
a
12v12
(
current
max
I
think)
.
|
|
|
6 |
\n
|
|
|
7 |
I want a max somewhere around 8v8 to 10v9 (split at 20), because 6v6 is not enough for a room split - splitting into 3v3 or 3v4 means rooms die too fast. 4v4s and above seem pretty stable.
|
Poll: Do you think maximum playernumber in teamgames should be lower?