| 1 |
I want a strategic bomber that drops NORMAL BOMBS. Like a Phoenix, only instead of dropping a bunch of napalm bombs, it drops bombs which simply explode and deal damage. The result is a large area covered with immediate splash damage.
|
1 |
I want a strategic bomber that drops NORMAL BOMBS. Like a Phoenix, only instead of dropping a bunch of napalm bombs, it drops bombs which simply explode and deal damage. The result is a large area covered with immediate splash damage.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
WHY: Seriously. Why do we not have a plane that just drops a bunch of good old explosive bombs? And a big, heavy bomber would be able to fly through anti-air, deliver bombs behind enemy lines, and possibly even survive.
|
3 |
WHY: Seriously. Why do we not have a plane that just drops a bunch of good old explosive bombs? And a big, heavy bomber would be able to fly through anti-air, deliver bombs behind enemy lines, and possibly even survive.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
I also want a cheap ground strike bird that drops a small payload of splash bombs.
|
5 |
I also want a cheap ground strike bird that drops a small payload of splash bombs.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
WHY: A smaller, cheaper bomber allows more interaction between a player going air and the rest of the map. Easily taken down by fighters or anti-air, and easily replaced. Perfect for bombing mexes and other light targets or clusters of light units, and it can take a hit for a more important plane if needed.
|
7 |
WHY: A smaller, cheaper bomber allows more interaction between a player going air and the rest of the map. Easily taken down by fighters or anti-air, and easily replaced. Perfect for bombing mexes and other light targets or clusters of light units, and it can take a hit for a more important plane if needed.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
And I want a bird that fires missiles at ground targets which has the range to evade anti-air. Much cheaper and less powerful than the Licho, but with great range and more expendable.
|
9 |
And I want a bird that fires missiles at ground targets which has the range to evade anti-air. Much cheaper and less powerful than the Licho, but with great range and more expendable.
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
WHY: Because an air player should be able to operate at the fringes of anti-air, and it is shocking that there are no anti-ground missiles on aircraft.
|
11 |
WHY: Because an air player should be able to operate at the fringes of anti-air, and it is shocking that there are no anti-ground missiles on aircraft.
|
| 12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
| 13 |
And I also want a gunship that fires long-range missiles at ground targets. A slow, expensive gunship that fires just one missile at long range instead of the Blackdawns' huge salvo.
|
13 |
And I also want a gunship that fires long-range missiles at ground targets. A slow, expensive gunship that fires just one missile at long range instead of the Blackdawns' huge salvo.
|
| 14 |
\n
|
14 |
\n
|
| 15 |
WHY: Because nothing else in the gunship factory has any range, and gunships also need a way to reach into an anti-air grid and inflict some pain. Hopefully the victim will invest in some flying anti-air, or perhaps some mobile AA to deal with the missile gunship(s).
|
15 |
WHY: Because nothing else in the gunship factory has any range, and gunships also need a way to reach into an anti-air grid and inflict some pain. Hopefully the victim will invest in some flying anti-air, or perhaps some mobile AA to deal with the missile gunship(s).
|
| 16 |
\n
|
16 |
\n
|
| 17 |
\n
|
17 |
\n
|
| 18 |
Also,
I
am
massively
in
favor
of
the
idea
of
having
fighters
with
a
limited
supply
of
air-to-air
missiles
which
can
use
air
pads
to
re-arm.
|
18 |
Also,
I
am
massively
in
favor
of
the
idea
of
having
fighters
with
a
limited
supply
of
fantastic
air-to-air
missiles
which
can
use
air
pads
to
re-arm.
|
What air units would you like to have?