Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Where's The Epic?

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
11/23/2013 4:17:13 AMCArankAdminShadowfury333 before revert after revert
Before After
1 I half see this point, but on the other hand (at least in 1v1) people aren't going to fac-switch just to control fewer units of a heavier weight class often. Usually when I see fac-switches it is to/from air, and the rest of the time to a shield/cloaky/LV factory when a jumpbot/spider opener isn't panning out. 1 I half see this point, but on the other hand (at least in 1v1) people aren't going to fac-switch just to control fewer units of a heavier weight class often. Usually when I see fac-switches it is to/from air, and the rest of the time to a shield/cloaky/LV factory when a jumpbot/spider opener isn't panning out.
2 \n 2 \n
3 Given that, I suppose I mainly see ZK games with 50 units per side at most, since I mostly see 1v1 games. This is comparable with Protoss and Terran in StarCraft, though StarCraft units clump by default since spreading them out is very attention-intensive. In ZK spreading into a single line is easy and generally encouraged by the game physics, though spreading into a box or multiple lines is a bit trickier, which is what you usually see in things that are "Epic". 3 Given that, I suppose I mainly see ZK games with 50 units per side at most, since I mostly see 1v1 games. This is comparable with Protoss and Terran in StarCraft, though StarCraft units clump by default since spreading them out is very attention-intensive. In ZK spreading into a single line is easy and generally encouraged by the game physics, though spreading into a box or multiple lines is a bit trickier, which is what you usually see in things that are "Epic".
4 \n
5 Overall though, I'm with @Pxtl, and it's one of the major reasons Zero-K is my favourite descendant of TA.