1 |
well,
I
see
that
this
version
doesnt
get
much
love.
no
prob,
I
will
used
it
in
some
other
way
and
make
a
new
one.
|
1 |
well,
I
see
that
this
version
doesnt
get
much
love.
no
prob,
I
will
use
it
in
some
other
way
and
make
a
new
one.
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
The only good point of the current defender-model is that its easy distinguishable from other units, thats what this one lacks, I admit that. But other than that, sorry the old one is just ugly.
|
3 |
The only good point of the current defender-model is that its easy distinguishable from other units, thats what this one lacks, I admit that. But other than that, sorry the old one is just ugly.
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
@GoogleFrog: wouldn´t your example mean that the turret would have a big baseplate again? also, it would be to close to the old design which is... imo... ugly.
|
5 |
@GoogleFrog: wouldn´t your example mean that the turret would have a big baseplate again? also, it would be to close to the old design which is... imo... ugly.
|
6 |
Why can´t the poles poke below the ground? Its water isnt it? Or just because it looks strange? It would add quite some polies to make those poles into telescope poles.
|
6 |
Why can´t the poles poke below the ground? Its water isnt it? Or just because it looks strange? It would add quite some polies to make those poles into telescope poles.
|
7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
8 |
I have an idea which should both look flimsy and have the missiles more visible as in the previous version. I will also include something to make it float able, totally forgot that on the current version :)
|
8 |
I have an idea which should both look flimsy and have the missiles more visible as in the previous version. I will also include something to make it float able, totally forgot that on the current version :)
|