| 1 |
I said
|
1 |
I said
|
| 2 |
[quote]Preferring to develop a small in-house solution over an available and well refined software is a choice that can be made. No need to use dishonest arguments to justify that choice.[/quote]
|
2 |
[quote]Preferring to develop a small in-house solution over an available and well refined software is a choice that can be made. No need to use dishonest arguments to justify that choice.[/quote]
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
[quote]Btw for comparing "little in house solution" of ZK with integrating a well developed product, you only need to visit site of BA:[/quote]
|
4 |
[quote]Btw for comparing "little in house solution" of ZK with integrating a well developed product, you only need to visit site of BA:[/quote]
|
| 5 |
Oh I see a "register" button. Requiring users to register is probably what is keeping users away. Is it because its impossible to use an external authentication db, or because the guy installing it didn't bother?
|
5 |
Oh I see a "register" button. Requiring users to register is probably what is keeping users away. Is it because its impossible to use an external authentication db, or because the guy installing it didn't bother?
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
Do you have to develop your own parsing/formatting code just to avoid user registration? No... saying so is what I call a dishonest argument.
|
7 |
Do you have to develop your own parsing/formatting code just to avoid user registration? No... saying so is what I call a dishonest argument.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
Now, I could go on and list what an available forum software can do that zk forum can't, but I would spend too much time doing so. If you prefer to ignore what other software are able to do, fine. I'll just consider this dishonest as well.
|
9 |
Now, I could go on and list what an available forum software can do that zk forum can't, but I would spend too much time doing so. If you prefer to ignore what other software are able to do, fine. I'll just consider this dishonest as well.
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
I
remember
that
when
you
decided
to
ban
me
was
because
I
made
a
demonstration
of
how
easy
it
is
to
hack
user
accounts
through
this
forum.
If
you
point
all
the
good
things
that
this
forum
can
do,
don't
forget
that
some
parts
are
half-baked
and
exploitable.
.
.
|
11 |
I
remember
that
when
you
decided
to
ban
me
was
because
I
made
a
demonstration
of
how
easy
it
is
to
hack
user
accounts
through
this
forum.
If
you
point
all
the
good
things
that
this
forum
can
do,
don't
forget
that
some
parts
are
half-baked
and
exploitable.
This
is
just
a
consequence
of
the
classical
80/20
rule.
.
.
write
80%
of
the
features
in
20%
of
the
time.
Then
you
call
it
done?
Sorry
but
I
disagree.
|
| 12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
| 13 |
Again, I said "its a choice that can be made". You made it, because you estimated it was easier this way. Fine, its your choice. But don't imply that it would not be possible to do it in another way, don't dismiss what the problems of the current forum are, and don't ignore all the missing features that will need to be developed to be on par with other forums.
|
13 |
Again, I said "its a choice that can be made". You made it, because you estimated it was easier this way. Fine, its your choice. But don't imply that it would not be possible to do it in another way, don't dismiss what the problems of the current forum are, and don't ignore all the missing features that will need to be developed to be on par with other forums.
|
|
|
14 |
\n
|
|
|
15 |
[quote]Forum is slow and devoid of activity, we are doing it right. [/quote]
|
|
|
16 |
To me, this is dishonest again. Considering that this site is not hosted on the same machine as zk forum, comparing the speed of it makes no sense at all. Host their forum on your server, then come back to discuss the speed of it.
|
|
|
17 |
\n
|
|
|
18 |
And regarding the "we are doing it right"... yes, not requiring an additional user registration is how it should be done. But I already showed that this has nothing to do with rewriting a forum from scratch so this point it moot too.
|
|
|
19 |
\n
|
Non-english forums