1 |
Well,
you
know
the
broken
window
fallacy--
"inefficiency
creates
jobs".
Jobs
that
don't
contribute
anything
necessary
and
could
be
put
to
good
use
elsewhere,
but
if
you
can
force
taxpayers
or
consumers
to
subsidize
them,
who
cares?
|
1 |
Well,
you
know
the
broken
window
fallacy-
"inefficiency
creates
jobs".
Jobs
that
don't
contribute
anything
necessary
and
could
be
put
to
good
use
elsewhere,
but
if
you
can
force
taxpayers
or
consumers
to
subsidize
them,
who
cares?
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
Other than those pesky taxpayers and consumers that is.
|
3 |
Other than those pesky taxpayers and consumers that is.
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
It appears worst in computer tech because the processing power keeps growing exponentially. That doesn't justify the requirements of new software that doesn't use all that power (or worse, uses it but doesn't actually need to). It also makes it much worse when computers can't be upgraded.
|
5 |
It appears worst in computer tech because the processing power keeps growing exponentially. That doesn't justify the requirements of new software that doesn't use all that power (or worse, uses it but doesn't actually need to). It also makes it much worse when computers can't be upgraded.
|
6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
7 |
I wonder if this is part of why Apple likes to cram all its hardware into a fused-together, un-upgradable package that can't be fixed personally (and is usually replaced by Apple rather than fixed at all). I think of it as the "iPod mentality".
|
7 |
I wonder if this is part of why Apple likes to cram all its hardware into a fused-together, un-upgradable package that can't be fixed personally (and is usually replaced by Apple rather than fixed at all). I think of it as the "iPod mentality".
|