| 1 |
Well I'm worried about style of communication.
|
1 |
Well I'm worried about style of communication.
|
| 2 |
One side has politics saying "I'm sure, I'm sure" even before UN inspectors arrive at the place.
|
2 |
One side has politics saying "I'm sure, I'm sure" even before UN inspectors arrive at the place.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
Other
released
100
page
document
with
photo
details,
weaponry
comparison
and
chemical
analyses.
|
4 |
Other
released
100
page
document
with
photo
details,
weaponry
comparison
and
chemical
analyses
AND
delivers
it
to
the
"I'm
sure
I'm
sure"
side.
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
To me the communication style taken by one side is simply unacceptable..
|
6 |
To me the communication style taken by one side is simply unacceptable..
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
Regardless of who is right. Personally I would think it's more likely that rebels did it simply because Assad forces are winning atm and it would be suicide to use chemical weapons knowing about Obama's red line. On the other hand attacking own people using sarin might be best option for losing rebels - to get USA on their side.
|
8 |
Regardless of who is right. Personally I would think it's more likely that rebels did it simply because Assad forces are winning atm and it would be suicide to use chemical weapons knowing about Obama's red line. On the other hand attacking own people using sarin might be best option for losing rebels - to get USA on their side.
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
It's also alarming that such reports are not widely publicized and analyzed by western media while random beliefs of politicians are.
|
10 |
It's also alarming that such reports are not widely publicized and analyzed by western media while random beliefs of politicians are.
|
Chemical strike - so who would you believe?