| 1 |
"what the fuck, you don't intervene in a genocide because it's "In your national interest"
|
1 |
"what the fuck, you don't intervene in a genocide because it's "In your national interest"
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
In fact, the still-current basic principle of international law regarding security issues is that a country is allowed to attack another only if (1) permission was granted by the Security Council or (2) self-defence.
|
3 |
In fact, the still-current basic principle of international law regarding security issues is that a country is allowed to attack another only if (1) permission was granted by the Security Council or (2) self-defence.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
Such permission from Security Council may only be granted within Chapter VII of the UN charter:
|
5 |
Such permission from Security Council may only be granted within Chapter VII of the UN charter:
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
CHAPTER VII: ACTION WITH RESPECT TO THREATS TO THE PEACE, BREACHES OF THE PEACE, AND ACTS OF AGGRESSION
|
7 |
CHAPTER VII: ACTION WITH RESPECT TO THREATS TO THE PEACE, BREACHES OF THE PEACE, AND ACTS OF AGGRESSION
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/chapter7.shtml
|
9 |
http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/chapter7.shtml
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
Threats to peace is meant as in threats to peace between countries, i.e. one country attacking another.
|
11 |
Threats to peace is meant as in threats to peace between countries, i.e. one country attacking another.
|
| 12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
| 13 |
There is no right under international law to attack another country because there's a civil war going on.
|
13 |
There is no right under international law to attack another country because there's a civil war going on.
|
| 14 |
\n
|
14 |
\n
|
| 15 |
On top of that, you readily admit that each side looks for its own interest but you seem to see propaganda only in Russia Today, but no in US or Australian medias. Why?
|
15 |
On top of that, you readily admit that each side looks for its own interest but you seem to see propaganda only in Russia Today, but no in US or Australian medias. Why?
|
| 16 |
\n
|
16 |
\n
|
| 17 |
Finaly, I would point out that Licho just asked a question without taking side? Is the mere fact of mentioning the view advanced by RT (and others) that the rebels might have commmited the attack enough to be the "mouthpiece of RT"???
|
17 |
Finaly, I would point out that Licho just asked a question without taking side? Is the mere fact of mentioning the view advanced by RT (and others) that the rebels might have commmited the attack enough to be the "mouthpiece of RT"???
|
|
|
18 |
\n
|
|
|
19 |
EDIT: ok, I overlooked the words "actually present date" which show where Licho leans
|
Chemical strike - so who would you believe?