| 1 |
IMO surfboard is utterly pointless of all fronts.
|
1 |
IMO surfboard is utterly pointless of all fronts.
|
| 2 |
* No land unit on top of a water transport will Be as effective as sea units...
|
2 |
* No land unit on top of a water transport will Be as effective as sea units...
|
| 3 |
* If transport dies, unit drowns...
|
3 |
* If transport dies, unit drowns...
|
| 4 |
* Looks silly as hell
|
4 |
* Looks silly as hell
|
| 5 |
* water only transport is silly when air transport is cheaper, faster, and can go anywhere... and still silly because of clunky usability.
|
5 |
* water only transport is silly when air transport is cheaper, faster, and can go anywhere... and still silly because of clunky usability.
|
| 6 |
* Hovers or amph do the sea > land assaults, so no reason to bring tanks or vehicles...
|
6 |
* Hovers or amph do the sea > land assaults, so no reason to bring tanks or vehicles...
|
| 7 |
* Cost is unbalancable, Either it makes a unit way to expensive to deploy in this fashion... or its so cheap that surfboard becomes the next scout/damage tank... or if surboard gets HP nerf then it's even more useless as a combat transport.
|
7 |
* Cost is unbalancable, Either it makes a unit way to expensive to deploy in this fashion... or its so cheap that surfboard becomes the next scout/damage tank... or if surboard gets HP nerf then it's even more useless as a combat transport.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
I think that *maybe* if it did something silly like generate shield (only when a unit is loaded) for like 20 metal, as well as transported unit takes ALL damage until it's destroyed... maybe it might be used once a century in one game...
|
10 |
I think that *maybe* if it did something silly like generate shield (only when a unit is loaded) for like 20 metal, as well as transported unit takes ALL damage until it's destroyed... maybe it might be used once a century in one game...
|
| 11 |
\n
|
11 |
\n
|
| 12 |
But then its still silly as a design decision, why would putting a land unit on top of a sea unit be better than building a sea unit?
|
12 |
But then its still silly as a design decision, why would putting a land unit on top of a sea unit be better than building a sea unit?
|
| 13 |
\n
|
13 |
\n
|
| 14 |
If we do keep it, it needs some major love...
|
14 |
If we do keep it, it needs some major love...
|
| 15 |
\n
|
15 |
\n
|
| 16 |
Which brings me to:
|
|
|
| 17 |
Here is a model I'd like feedback on (although I would PREFER it be removed)
|
|
|
| 18 |
\n
|
|
|
| 19 |
[img]http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee17/General_Kerr/surfin_zpsb2bdb820.jpg[/img]
|
|
|
| 20 |
\n
|
|
|
| 21 |
For your enjoyment:
|
16 |
For your enjoyment:
|
| 22 |
http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee17/General_Kerr/butthurt_zps7e7c3250.jpg
|
17 |
http://i233.photobucket.com/albums/ee17/General_Kerr/butthurt_zps7e7c3250.jpg
|
I would like to nominate the surfboard as the most pointless unit of the year.