| 1 |
yes he could be forgiven but when you dont even acknoledge the mistake you are not ask or even saying you need forgiveness. yes i can too but his about how the game is admistered. and bsically unless it its a major and i mean above any of this (what you call petty bs). i am not looking for punishment of there actions i am looking for a guarenttee that admins are not abusing there power. and the fact that i know andmins ignored my report but imediatly acted upon the report of my bad behavior. there for not treating me an pat equally. now when i went to get more carification i got more detais about your proceedures. and thye only cover the player base not the admin as they dont really have any they can change the way they do anything at anytime.and they are not held acountable as there are no, not even one, rule governing them. there are many post i see on here any one who trys to adress the issue of admin powers get locked. and it was spring comparing he posted it i was only refuting his comprison was. any keep giving you ideas as this is was this thread is for.
|
1 |
yes he could be forgiven but when you dont even acknoledge the mistake you are not ask or even saying you need forgiveness. yes i can too but his about how the game is admistered. and bsically unless it its a major and i mean above any of this (what you call petty bs). i am not looking for punishment of there actions i am looking for a guarenttee that admins are not abusing there power. and the fact that i know andmins ignored my report but imediatly acted upon the report of my bad behavior. there for not treating me an pat equally. now when i went to get more carification i got more detais about your proceedures. and thye only cover the player base not the admin as they dont really have any they can change the way they do anything at anytime.and they are not held acountable as there are no, not even one, rule governing them. there are many post i see on here any one who trys to adress the issue of admin powers get locked. and it was spring comparing he posted it i was only refuting his comprison was. any keep giving you ideas as this is was this thread is for.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
as for they are fre to adminster as they see fit not as the rule book stae as there is no rule book. they are free to abus there powers of admin too not abuse other player but then again that debatible as to what abuse is. so if i say hi to pat i know he dont like me some could debate that im harrasing and abusing him, or i told some one that "thats a newb move" that is also debatable as if it is abuse. just like you said i suck that is debatable on if that is abuse read in a nother thread was about [doop]fortala (if spelled wrong sorry)iot told him calling some one a newb is abuse. so agian no rules means they aplied the rule as they wish and put the rules to the wayside when they wish. so atleast in zero-k becuase there is not one rule governing admins. there is no such term as favortism or abuse of power. they do not exist in the perview of zero-k.
|
3 |
as for they are fre to adminster as they see fit not as the rule book stae as there is no rule book. they are free to abus there powers of admin too not abuse other player but then again that debatible as to what abuse is. so if i say hi to pat i know he dont like me some could debate that im harrasing and abusing him, or i told some one that "thats a newb move" that is also debatable as if it is abuse. just like you said i suck that is debatable on if that is abuse read in a nother thread was about [doop]fortala (if spelled wrong sorry)iot told him calling some one a newb is abuse. so agian no rules means they aplied the rule as they wish and put the rules to the wayside when they wish. so atleast in zero-k becuase there is not one rule governing admins. there is no such term as favortism or abuse of power. they do not exist in the perview of zero-k.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
|
|
5 |
as for this satement.
|
|
|
6 |
\n
|
|
|
7 |
What if the rule was "If someone spams, kick them", and then someone spammed so much that a ban was needed? The admin would be breaking the rule if he banned. in that situation you just said the rule would warrent them being banned but then by banning him your breaking it???? them you make this comment; "It is better to have admins rule by common sense" you have no clue what commen sence is as these statements point that out!! the admin would breaking the rule if he DIDN'T ban!!
|
| 5 |
if you will here me out.
|
8 |
if you will here me out.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 7 |
i suggest pick three of your most honorable admins and have it there duty to check up on the regular andmins they only deal with admins the regular admins deal with the players and the "super admins". this creates a check and balance does it not??
|
10 |
i suggest pick three of your most honorable admins and have it there duty to check up on the regular andmins they only deal with admins the regular admins deal with the players and the "super admins". this creates a check and balance does it not??
|
who administer justice to admins?