Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

opinions on current funnelweb

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
7/14/2013 3:11:40 PMPLrankRafalpluk before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]Yes, and funnelweb isn't amphibious. Leviathan is already hilariously cost-effective as an anti, since an immobile uncloakable structure of the ground anni costs just as much as leviathan, and that's even without having a silo bolted on top.[/quote] 1 [quote]Yes, and funnelweb isn't amphibious. Leviathan is already hilariously cost-effective as an anti, since an immobile uncloakable structure of the ground anni costs just as much as leviathan, and that's even without having a silo bolted on top.[/quote]
2 \n
3 Leviathan is not that cost-effective as an anti - it has like half or less of the coverage of normal anti. It only works because it is hidden. 2 Leviathan is not that cost-effective as an anti - it has like half or less of the coverage of normal anti. It only works because it is hidden.
4 Reef of the other hand... now this is cost-effective. 3 Reef of the other hand... now this is cost-effective.
4 \n
5 So I think FunnelWeb with an anti range of Leviathan would be ok. It would only protect its surrounding army because everything further could be killed by nuke splash. And for 6000M it wouln't really be worth making for anti only.