| 1 |
@GoogleFrog, @Licho, myself and @KingRaptor are the ones mostly involved in balance. Other devs get a say, skilled players voices are always listened to, Google tends to have final word.
|
1 |
@GoogleFrog, @Licho, myself and @KingRaptor are the ones mostly involved in balance. Other devs get a say, skilled players voices are always listened to, Google tends to have final word.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
I can speak fairly competently for the rest of the dev team but there are going to be points they disagree on. When I say 'we', I am discussing a position I think has a majority consensus (and I think particularly GoogleFrog will agree with). When I say 'I' I am expressing personal preference.
|
3 |
I can speak fairly competently for the rest of the dev team but there are going to be points they disagree on. When I say 'we', I am discussing a position I think has a majority consensus (and I think particularly GoogleFrog will agree with). When I say 'I' I am expressing personal preference.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
For example when I say I think e-cell is too mandatory and fac assisting sub-optimal that's my personal opinion, but I know Licho has expressed concern that compush is the only viable strategy and other players generally agree that e-cell start is almost the only valid one (Though they may differ on whether that's good or bad).
|
5 |
For example when I say I think e-cell is too mandatory and fac assisting sub-optimal that's my personal opinion, but I know Licho has expressed concern that compush is the only viable strategy and other players generally agree that e-cell start is almost the only valid one (Though they may differ on whether that's good or bad).
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
Comms
need
more
work,
I
think
every
dev
agrees
on
that
though
I
think
most
also
don't
consider
it
a
priority.
What
they
don't
need
to
be
is
simply
stronger,
I
think
that
has
general
consensus
(
Google
certainly
would
not
want
comm-focused
play)
.
Last
time
we
fiddled
in
a
fairly
minor
way
with
comms
(
reducing
base
morph
costs
and
inherent
bonuses)
a
huge
number
of
really
ridiculous
comm-builds
totally
dominated
play,
it
was
silly.
This
was
mostly
because
the
modules
were
really
never
properly
balanced.
|
7 |
Comms
need
more
work,
I
think
every
dev
agrees
on
that
though
I
think
most
also
don't
consider
it
a
priority.
What
they
don't
need
to
be
is
simply
stronger,
I
think
that
has
general
consensus
(
Google
certainly
would
not
want
comm-focused
play)
.
Last
time
we
fiddled
in
a
fairly
minor
way
with
comms
(
reducing
base
morph
costs
and
inherent
bonuses)
a
huge
number
of
really
ridiculous
comm-builds
totally
dominated
play,
it
was
silly.
This
was
mostly
because
the
modules
were
really
never
properly
balanced:
Morph
3
gave
a
huge
boost
(
2x)
in
offensive
power,
and
several
of
the
activable
weapons
at
that
level
were
just
ridiculously
effective
when
rushed.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
You're free to make suggestions but some of the issues can be fairly complex.
|
9 |
You're free to make suggestions but some of the issues can be fairly complex.
|
Trollcoms are useless