1 |
[quote]If more ppls play on the test hosts per default, we wouldn't have such bugs in zk:stable...[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]If more ppls play on the test hosts per default, we wouldn't have such bugs in zk:stable...[/quote]
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
I don't think devs can expect players to use a randomly broken test version. Why would anyone care to use a test version if this version is known to be broken by devs because they commit half-working code (work in progress). The test version should also follow some kind of release process... players who dont follow zkdev will just waste their time if they don't know if test version is supposed to work and need to be considered "release candidate" or just "random brokenage included/work in progress".
|
3 |
I don't think devs can expect players to use a randomly broken test version. Why would anyone care to use a test version if this version is known to be broken by devs because they commit half-working code (work in progress). The test version should also follow some kind of release process... players who dont follow zkdev will just waste their time if they don't know if test version is supposed to work and need to be considered "release candidate" or just "random brokenage included/work in progress".
|
|
|
4 |
\n
|
|
|
5 |
If players spend some time to test a version and report a problem and are being told "yeah of course we know its broken", they will probably never test again. So make RC releases...
|