| 1 |
^.^ and ill rephrase that as well...
|
1 |
^.^ and ill rephrase that as well...
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
conservation of momentum is still just a theory, not a "law". simply put there are no concretes in science. you just make observations, and explain them the best you can. then someone comes along and explains it beter then you do...
|
3 |
conservation of momentum is still just a theory, not a "law". simply put there are no concretes in science. you just make observations, and explain them the best you can. then someone comes along and explains it beter then you do...
|
|
|
4 |
\n
|
|
|
5 |
if i did the experiment myself, and analyzed the results, i would be able to say wether this is true or not. at the moment i havent even read the paper on this, and honestly the phrasing seems dodgy so i have no real opinion if its true or not.
|
|
|
6 |
\n
|
|
|
7 |
:P the simple fact is lots of intresting things happen at high/low temeprtures, presured, and energy levels(voltage/velocity/ampage/mater density)... so
|
Newton's laws defiled by new propellantless microwave thruster.