Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

balancing of uneven teams

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
5/9/2012 5:01:52 PMUSrankAdminJasper before revert after revert
5/9/2012 4:59:39 PMUSrankAdminJasper before revert after revert
Before After
1 Sheep 1750 + 1650 I would likely lose. 1 Sheep 1750 + 1650 I would likely lose.
2 \n 2 \n
3 1850 + 1650 I would lose 100%. 3 1850 + 1650 I would lose 100%.
4 \n 4 \n
5 even 1650 + 1600 2vs1 I think I would have a high likelihood of losing.
6 \n
5 Handicaps creates a race to the bottom. Artificially handicapping one team makes everyone equally bad. 7 Handicaps creates a race to the bottom. Artificially handicapping one team makes everyone equally bad.
6 \n 8 \n
7 Saying it would destroying the ELO system is not a radical statement. Elo is based on likelihood of winning. A handicap reduces that likelihood hence destroying the ELO system. 9 Saying it would destroying the ELO system is not a radical statement. Elo is based on likelihood of winning. A handicap reduces that likelihood hence destroying the ELO system.