1 |
agree. it`s also the same map wich is further narrowing the scenario down.
|
1 |
agree. it`s also the same map wich is further narrowing the scenario down.
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
i know that this is by no means a perfect test, but it`s what we could do.
|
3 |
i know that this is by no means a perfect test, but it`s what we could do.
|
4 |
involving more people is fine, i just think that the time-dimension is a bit
|
4 |
involving more people is fine, i just think that the time-dimension is a bit
|
5 |
underrepresented, aka the same players playing a meaningful number of games.
|
5 |
underrepresented, aka the same players playing a meaningful number of games.
|
6 |
i played 2 games with GF recently and we switched facs after the first game.
|
6 |
i played 2 games with GF recently and we switched facs after the first game.
|
7 |
that gives useful info, but this info is more "broad", less "deep".
|
7 |
that gives useful info, but this info is more "broad", less "deep".
|
|
|
8 |
to get "broader" data, everyone is invited to do those games.
|
|
|
9 |
\n
|
|
|
10 |
Knowing fac beforehand in this case is a bit less of a problem, since i think
|
|
|
11 |
tanks start witch a kodachi in almost all cases, as well as it is safe to assume
|
|
|
12 |
that rover-players begin with dart/constructor/scorcher.
|
|
|
13 |
\n
|
|
|
14 |
\n
|
|
|
15 |
+ it was a spontanous thing, so i did not think about inviting more people.
|
|
|
16 |
\n
|
|
|
17 |
\n
|