Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

The Pylon

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
4/17/2012 1:47:17 AMUSrankmarathon before revert after revert
Before After
1 >It takes time for the Glaive to target each wind and move in range. 1 >It takes time for the Glaive to target each wind and move in range.
2 True, but wouldn't it also take extra time for a con to move into range and build it? 2 True, but wouldn't it also take extra time for a con to move into range and build it?
3 \n 3 \n
4 >Build 6 winds in a straight line and I guarantee you that it will take a Glaive longer to kill the winds than the Pylon. 4 >Build 6 winds in a straight line and I guarantee you that it will take a Glaive longer to kill the winds than the Pylon.
5 If the glaive were to take out a single wind gen, then the grid would be disconected and it may take time for a con to rebuild it as it needs to get there. 5 If the glaive were to take out a single wind gen, then the grid would be disconected and it may take time for a con to rebuild it as it needs to get there.
6 \n 6 \n
7 Now that I think about it, linking a grid with wind does make a good excuse to build it early game, but mid to late game, pylon may be better. 7 Now that I think about it, linking a grid with wind does make a good excuse to build it ( wind gens) early game, but mid to late game, pylon may be better.