1 |
>It takes time for the Glaive to target each wind and move in range.
|
1 |
>It takes time for the Glaive to target each wind and move in range.
|
2 |
True, but wouldn't it also take extra time for a con to move into range and build it?
|
2 |
True, but wouldn't it also take extra time for a con to move into range and build it?
|
3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
4 |
>Build 6 winds in a straight line and I guarantee you that it will take a Glaive longer to kill the winds than the Pylon.
|
4 |
>Build 6 winds in a straight line and I guarantee you that it will take a Glaive longer to kill the winds than the Pylon.
|
5 |
If the glaive were to take out a single wind gen, then the grid would be disconected and it may take time for a con to rebuild it as it needs to get there.
|
5 |
If the glaive were to take out a single wind gen, then the grid would be disconected and it may take time for a con to rebuild it as it needs to get there.
|
6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
7 |
Now
that
I
think
about
it,
linking
a
grid
with
wind
does
make
a
good
excuse
to
build
it
early
game,
but
mid
to
late
game,
pylon
may
be
better.
|
7 |
Now
that
I
think
about
it,
linking
a
grid
with
wind
does
make
a
good
excuse
to
build
it
(
wind
gens)
early
game,
but
mid
to
late
game,
pylon
may
be
better.
|