| 1 |
Alone, I cannot control 2 armies of different teams at once. For me, a good counter needs to cost less and eliminate the opposition, if the fight cannot be avoided.
|
1 |
Alone, I cannot control 2 armies of different teams at once. For me, a good counter needs to cost less and eliminate the opposition, if the fight cannot be avoided.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
[q]I see no way for 2 Scorchers to win against 1 well-controlled Blitz (that is, if it stays at its maximum range, at which it deals 100% damage while Scorchers' heatrays deal 5% at most).
|
3 |
[q]I see no way for 2 Scorchers to win against 1 well-controlled Blitz (that is, if it stays at its maximum range, at which it deals 100% damage while Scorchers' heatrays deal 5% at most).
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
If you obtained such a result, your methodology is very suspect.[/q]
|
5 |
If you obtained such a result, your methodology is very suspect.[/q]
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
In that case a single Scorcher (which has longer range and is faster), perfectly controlled, should be able to eliminate a Blitz, given enough time. I don't think I could manage it though.
|
7 |
In that case a single Scorcher (which has longer range and is faster), perfectly controlled, should be able to eliminate a Blitz, given enough time. I don't think I could manage it though.
|
|
|
8 |
\n
|
|
|
9 |
Back to the tips. In a fictional scenario, where my opponent attaks with Blitzes, I would stand a better chance defending with Rippers than with Darts.
|
Wiki