| 1 |
The difference between your three cases is often verbiage used. I'll elaborate:
|
1 |
The difference between your three cases is often verbiage used. I'll elaborate:
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
[url=https://pastebin.com/Yah47r5m]This is[/url] from @B875387 where @Ontheheavens [b]purposefully and vindictively[/b] eats a tacnuke sub I was resurrecting just because [tooltip=because he was ignored due to his prior antagonisms. Even then, this is an extremely weak argument for vengeful reclaiming and sabotaging the team as he could still have assisted the resurrection since energy is largely shared when one is excessing.] he wasn't gifted a geo when demanded[/tooltip] ) This is not greed, this is intentional sabotage that most people largely ignore (Case 1). In fact I don't understand why reclaim isn't blocked on athena resurrection.
|
3 |
[url=https://pastebin.com/Yah47r5m]This is[/url] from @B875387 where @Ontheheavens [b]purposefully and vindictively[/b] eats a tacnuke sub I was resurrecting just because [tooltip=because he was ignored due to his prior antagonisms. Even then, this is an extremely weak argument for vengeful reclaiming and sabotaging the team as he could still have assisted the resurrection since energy is largely shared when one is excessing.] he wasn't gifted a geo when demanded[/tooltip] ) This is not greed, this is intentional sabotage that most people largely ignore (Case 1). In fact I don't understand why reclaim isn't blocked on athena resurrection.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
Case 2 is overlookable when they're clearly not able to understand english or their actions. This is an example of most of the noobs "nanotrolling" as they don't really understand that income is mostly shared.
|
5 |
Case 2 is overlookable when they're clearly not able to understand english or their actions. This is an example of most of the noobs "nanotrolling" as they don't really understand that income is mostly shared.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
Case 3 is really less of a case and more of a variable.
|
7 |
Case 3 is really less of a case and more of a variable.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
[quote]Is being a jerk bannable?[/quote]
|
9 |
[quote]Is being a jerk bannable?[/quote]
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
Does it sabotage the team?
|
11 |
Does it sabotage the team?
|
| 12 |
What was the intention behind the action?
|
12 |
What was the intention behind the action?
|
| 13 |
Did the action contribute to the team meaningfully?
|
13 |
Did the action contribute to the team meaningfully?
|
| 14 |
\n
|
14 |
\n
|
| 15 |
Reclaiming a comm while a nub resurrects it may ruin other people's fun, but this is because the user knows the comm isn't useful and the metal can be reappropriated to other projects that may provide more utility. The intention isn't malicious, unless the user clearly has something against the noob. Even then this would be a grey area (decidable by the verbiage used toward the user in the situation). Now if the user was trying to resurrect something more useful (bertha, nuke, singu, etc) then there would be less of a grey area unless that reclaim is going to something even more useful.
|
15 |
Reclaiming a comm while a nub resurrects it may ruin other people's fun, but this is because the user knows the comm isn't useful and the metal can be reappropriated to other projects that may provide more utility. The intention isn't malicious, unless the user clearly has something against the noob. Even then this would be a grey area (decidable by the verbiage used toward the user in the situation). Now if the user was trying to resurrect something more useful (bertha, nuke, singu, etc) then there would be less of a grey area unless that reclaim is going to something even more useful.
|
| 16 |
\n
|
16 |
\n
|
| 17 |
TL;DR:
History
+
Chat
+
Readable
intentions
dictates
whether
or
not
being
a
jerk
is
bannable.
|
17 |
TL;DR:
History
+
Chat
+
Readable
intentions
+
impact
on
game
dictates
whether
or
not
being
a
jerk
is
bannable.
|
Greed