Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Banned from the lobby

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
2/20/2020 11:26:55 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
2/20/2020 11:26:08 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
2/20/2020 11:24:27 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
2/20/2020 11:23:50 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
2/20/2020 11:23:35 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
2/20/2020 4:27:25 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]Maybe we will disagree on this but the consensus I have seen in every game where users are allowed to host their own rooms, is that the host has full control.[/quote] 1 [quote]Maybe we will disagree on this but the consensus I have seen in every game where users are allowed to host their own rooms, is that the host has full control.[/quote]
2 I expect most to all of those games did not regularly have most of the active community inside a single room. Different circumstances lead to different conclusions. 2 I expect most to all of those games did not regularly have most of the active community inside a single room. Different circumstances lead to different conclusions.
3 \n 3 \n
4 [quote]That is only for the usual game modes/maps. I'd also think that is an argument against the possibility of clique-ism becoming a problem.[/quote] 4 [quote]That is only for the usual game modes/maps. I'd also think that is an argument against the possibility of clique-ism becoming a problem.[/quote]
5 It's not clear to me how anything I said is an argument against clique-ism becoming a problem. 5 It's not clear to me how anything I said is an argument against clique-ism becoming a problem.
6 \n 6 \n
7 [quote]but I think there is a certain sacredness to the host's right to control the conditions of the game that he/she is hosting. Admins interfering with player-hosted games feels like a boundary that shouldn't be crossed[/quote] 7 [quote]but I think there is a certain sacredness to the host's right to control the conditions of the game that he/she is hosting. Admins interfering with player-hosted games feels like a boundary that shouldn't be crossed[/quote]
8 In the past the admins were more reluctant to cross this boundary. Events proved to us that it was necessary to do so. Unless you are engaging with the reasons *why* it became necessary, hand-wringing arguments about "sacredness" and what not are utterly irrelevant. 8 In the past the admins were more reluctant to cross this boundary. Events proved to us that it was necessary to do so. Unless you are engaging with the reasons *why* it became necessary, hand-wringing arguments about "sacredness" and what not are utterly irrelevant.
9 \n
10 EDIT: I see @TinySpider has contributed another post of the form "Oh but its my room I wanna be able to do what I want" without engaging with the reasons why the current rule exists. Yawn.
11 \n
12 Wake me when somebody makes a new point. Preferably one which refers to how the world [b]is[/b], and the existence of the one room culture, and not the make-believe world you [b]wish[/b] you lived in.